Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 34

Thread: Football 101. What to do on first down.

  1. #1
    Member Since
    Sep 2007
    Location
    RIGHT NEXT TO ARROWHEAD!
    Posts
    18,752

    Default Football 101. What to do on first down.

    GRETZ: First Things First

    Oct 05, 2007, 8:57:05 AM by Bob Gretz - FAQ


    There were a lot of smiles among the offensive players in the Chiefs locker room this week.
    That’s what winning and a strong second half performance last Sunday will do. Larry Johnson was smiling because he finally broke through with a long run that wasn’t called back by a penalty. He was even able to joke Thursday about a rookie defensive back getting into the end zone before he did.
    Eddie Kennison was smiling because he’s going to get back on the field this Sunday against Jacksonville. Remember, he suffered a hamstring injury on the first offensive play of the season down in Houston a month ago. Dwayne Bowe almost always seems to have a smile on his face, as he dreams of more days like last Sunday. Tony Gonzalez was smiling too, because he’s about to become the top touchdown catcher among tight ends in pro football history.
    After their slow start, the offense deserved a little sugar for what happened against the Chargers.
    But one thing did not get solved in the San Diego victory and it’s one of the biggest problems standing between the Chiefs offense and productivity: first down.
    When it comes to the first play of any possession, the Chiefs are not very good. In fact, they rank among the worst offenses in the league. If you want to zero in on this team’s offensive travails, the first and biggest domino is first down.
    So far this season, the Chiefs have had 100 snaps on first down; a nice round number to work with. Of those 100 plays, 60 produced gains of four yards or less. On average, they gained 4.36 yards on first down. The league leader is Dallas, averaging 7.66 yards on first down. The league average is 5.29 yards on first down.
    That’s a pretty ugly number for the Chiefs. But dig under the surface, and it’s even worse. On 83 second down plays, the Chiefs average down and distance situation was 2nd-and-8.6 yards to go. Only San Francisco (9.08 yards) faced a tougher task on second down.
    Second and nearly nine yards to go is no-man’s land for a play-caller. It’s an obvious passing down, and that makes it so much easier for defenses to decipher the offensive plan. Invariably, it leads to third down-and-long and then a punt. On those second down plays, the Chiefs gained enough for a first down 22 times. That means they faced third down 53 times, converting it 18 times for 34 percent. That ranks tied for 28th.
    Although there have been examples (Minnesota game) where first down was dominated by either the run or pass, overall the Chiefs have been 55-45 on first down, run to pass.
    OK, so what does all this mean? The Chiefs coaching staff must continue to handle first down as it did against San Diego, where it was almost 50-50 run to pass. Teams have spent the whole off-season preparing for the Chiefs running game. They knew little about the Chiefs passing game. If they want to crowd the line of scrimmage, then put the ball in Damon Huard’s hands. If they backup, put the ball in L.J.’s belly.
    Mostly what must improve is the offensive execution. Early seasons excuses like training camp injuries and a lack of time to work together no longer hold water. Four games into the season, it’s time the offensive line and the entire offense pulls together and begins to work with some rhythm.
    Only then, will the first-down problem find a solution.



    http://www.kcchiefs.com/news/2007/10..._things_first/
    http://arrowheadjunkies.com/pictures/PhotoShop/sig_pics/NFL_Players/kansas_city_chiefs/tyson.jackson/062009/tyson.jackson.500.png

  2. #2
    Member Since
    Sep 2005
    Location
    SE Kansas
    Posts
    31,643

    Default

    I was going to move this thread to the Hardcore Discussion forum, but, alas, I have a question regarding the following quote:

    That’s a pretty ugly number for the Chiefs. But dig under the surface, and it’s even worse. On 83 second down plays, the Chiefs average down and distance situation was 2nd-and-8.6 yards to go. Only San Francisco (9.08 yards) faced a tougher task on second down.
    Second and nearly nine yards to go is no-man’s land for a play-caller. It’s an obvious passing down, and that makes it so much easier for defenses to decipher the offensive plan. Invariably, it leads to third down-and-long and then a punt. On those second down plays, the Chiefs gained enough for a first down 22 times. That means they faced third down 53 times, converting it 18 times for 34 percent. That ranks tied for 28th.
    Why is that necessarily a passing down; might not a draw play possibly catch the defense off guard?

  3. #3
    Member Since
    Sep 2007
    Location
    RIGHT NEXT TO ARROWHEAD!
    Posts
    18,752

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chiefster View Post
    I was going to move this thread to the Hardcore Discussion forum, but, alas, I have a question regarding the following quote:



    Why is that necessarily a passing down; might not a draw play possibly catch the defense off guard?
    I agree with you that a draw is an awesome play to call with LJ as a back.

    The upside to this is the defense won't know what is coming now, because we are spreading the field.

    A draw play would be perfectly acceptable, even a good idea(!), now that the opposing defense is not looking for LJ EVERY time we have an offensive play.

    Then again I don't recall watching LJ pass block for Huard yet this year.

    Can you?

    (I put this in the Locker Room because I thought people were ignoring me for putting stuff about the Chiefs in Hardcore. Should have followed my instinckeds!)
    http://arrowheadjunkies.com/pictures/PhotoShop/sig_pics/NFL_Players/kansas_city_chiefs/tyson.jackson/062009/tyson.jackson.500.png

  4. #4
    Member Since
    Sep 2005
    Location
    SE Kansas
    Posts
    31,643

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hermhater View Post
    I agree with you that a draw is an awesome play to call with LJ as a back.

    The upside to this is the defense won't know what is coming now, because we are spreading the field.

    A draw play would be perfectly acceptable, even a good idea(!), now that the opposing defense is not looking for LJ EVERY time we have an offensive play.

    Then again I don't recall watching LJ pass block for Huard yet this year.

    Can you?

    (I put this in the Locker Room because I thought people were ignoring me for putting stuff about the Chiefs in Hardcore. Should have followed my instinckeds!)
    Agreed; I too disagree with that scenario being an obvious passing down.

    ...And, no apology necessary.

  5. #5
    Member Since
    Aug 2007
    Location
    OKC, OK
    Posts
    3,715

    Default

    I think it's okay to run or pass on first down. the problem we seem to have is we don't switch it up. Draw, up the gut, screen, reverse, go down the field, fullback sweep, etc. There are so many other things we can call. I see us changing up a little which I like.
    <a href=http://img218.imageshack.us/img218/5893/dthomassp2.jpg target=_blank>http://img218.imageshack.us/img218/5893/dthomassp2.jpg</a>

    Official thread killer I have heard.

  6. #6
    Member Since
    May 2006
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    9,152

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chiefster View Post



    Why is that necessarily a passing down; might not a draw play possibly catch the defense off guard?
    Or a reverse is nice, for that kind of situation.

  7. #7
    Member Since
    Sep 2005
    Location
    SE Kansas
    Posts
    31,643

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chief31 View Post
    Or a reverse is nice, for that kind of situation.
    Absolutely agree; I think the author of the article is a bit short sighted.

  8. #8
    Member Since
    Aug 2007
    Location
    OKC, OK
    Posts
    3,715

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chiefster View Post
    Absolutely agree; I think the author of the article is a bit short sighted.
    I

    would have to agree Chiefster. I don't think the author thought things thru.
    <a href=http://img218.imageshack.us/img218/5893/dthomassp2.jpg target=_blank>http://img218.imageshack.us/img218/5893/dthomassp2.jpg</a>

    Official thread killer I have heard.

  9. #9
    Member Since
    Sep 2005
    Location
    SE Kansas
    Posts
    31,643

    Default

    Wow! I have never had so many agree with me before. This posting thoughtful replies stuff is pretty cool!

  10. #10
    Member Since
    Sep 2007
    Location
    RIGHT NEXT TO ARROWHEAD!
    Posts
    18,752

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chiefster View Post
    Wow! I have never had so many agree with me before. This posting thoughtful replies stuff is pretty cool!
    Why start now?

    http://arrowheadjunkies.com/pictures/PhotoShop/sig_pics/NFL_Players/kansas_city_chiefs/tyson.jackson/062009/tyson.jackson.500.png

Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •