Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: how did LJ and HUARD look?

  1. #1
    Member Since
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    900

    Default how did LJ and HUARD look?

    i just heard it on radio....so i dont know how good they did. Just that they put up numbers. Did Johnson run different than the previous games? Did huard throw on the mark, or did his receivers bail him out? Is our defense AWESOME?!?!!?

  2. #2
    Member Since
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    900

    Default

    also, how was the play calling this game?

  3. #3
    Member Since
    Sep 2007
    Location
    RIGHT NEXT TO ARROWHEAD!
    Posts
    18,752

    Default

    Huard was actually pretty accurate today.

    LJ got some good blocks and good runs. That fumble on the 1 yard line really hurt though.

    Our defense was playing awesome the first half, and kind of loosened up in the second half. 4 sacks in the first half, none in the second.

    2 int I think.
    http://arrowheadjunkies.com/pictures/PhotoShop/sig_pics/NFL_Players/kansas_city_chiefs/tyson.jackson/062009/tyson.jackson.500.png

  4. #4
    Member Since
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Syracuse, NY
    Posts
    70

    Default

    The D in the second half was in full prevent, and they didn't give up the game, so I guess they did what they were supposed to. Dominant? No, not at all. In the prevent they had an INT, so that's good enough.

  5. #5
    Member Since
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Illinois... No longer .. Finally back home Blue Springs MO
    Posts
    2,417

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by timsatt1 View Post
    i just heard it on radio....so i dont know how good they did. Just that they put up numbers. Did Johnson run different than the previous games? Did huard throw on the mark, or did his receivers bail him out? Is our defense AWESOME?!?!!?
    LJ looked pretty good, Didn't like the penalty against him, Didn't like the fumble at the endzone, but pretty good overall.

    Defense was great first half, played hermie ball second half didnt look near as good.

    I do have a different take on Huard however, part of the game he looked good, but I feel we won despite Huard, If Herm sees the same game I saw next week we may see Croyle start. Huard cost us somewhere around 18 points, not his best day, problem is we won and he will get the credit for that.

    I think it is time for Huard the backup to emerge and ride the pines again.

    Also second half LJ got like 20 yards total, we cant go to run run run punt that early in the game, we should have hung a 40 burger on Cincy, if that is all the better we can do we are going to have a long year.

    Jared Allen is a stud, the D Has serious potential if Hermie doesn't kill them, and The O line looked fairly good today but that may have been partially Cincys doing.

    All in all I feel we won despite ourselves today, but a win is a win, Let the flaming begin.

  6. #6
    Member Since
    Aug 2007
    Location
    OKC, OK
    Posts
    3,715

    Default

    ALl in all both players did ok. LJ had a good game running but made some costly mistakes. Huard I think was ok but others will disagree.
    <a href=http://img218.imageshack.us/img218/5893/dthomassp2.jpg target=_blank>http://img218.imageshack.us/img218/5893/dthomassp2.jpg</a>

    Official thread killer I have heard.

  7. #7
    Member Since
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    486

    Default

    Huard was on the mark. He hit Tony on the up and out where only Tony could catch the ball. He hit Tony again in stride for a long TD. LJ looked good first half but slowed down the second half. The fumble did hurt but the D was able to strip it. As much as it is LJ's fault for not holding onto the ball Bangles D made a good play by forcing the fumble. Line threw good blocks to give LJ room to run and Huard time to pass.

    D was solid for the most part few mistakes here and there but they did not give up the game against a passing team who is built to come back. Not to mention the sacks and ints as well as a forced fumble.

    Over all Id say it was our best preformace especially on the offensive side. Great job Chiefs!

    Welcome to Arrowhead

  8. #8
    Member Since
    Aug 2007
    Location
    OKC, OK
    Posts
    3,715

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by m0ebr0 View Post
    Huard was on the mark. He hit Tony on the up and out where only Tony could catch the ball. He hit Tony again in stride for a long TD. LJ looked good first half but slowed down the second half. The fumble did hurt but the D was able to strip it. As much as it is LJ's fault for not holding onto the ball Bangles D made a good play by forcing the fumble. Line threw good blocks to give LJ room to run and Huard time to pass.

    D was solid for the most part few mistakes here and there but they did not give up the game against a passing team who is built to come back. Not to mention the sacks and ints as well as a forced fumble.

    Over all Id say it was our best preformace especially on the offensive side. Great job Chiefs!
    Enough said!
    <a href=http://img218.imageshack.us/img218/5893/dthomassp2.jpg target=_blank>http://img218.imageshack.us/img218/5893/dthomassp2.jpg</a>

    Official thread killer I have heard.

  9. #9
    Member Since
    Aug 2007
    Location
    sw missouri
    Posts
    363

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by timsatt1 View Post
    also, how was the play calling this game?
    Team looked good but what is this playcalling you speak of?
    The Ozarks is Chiefs Country

  10. #10
    Member Since
    Aug 2007
    Location
    OKC, OK
    Posts
    3,715

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by swmochiefsfan View Post
    Team looked good but what is this playcalling you speak of?
    You know run run run punt plays
    <a href=http://img218.imageshack.us/img218/5893/dthomassp2.jpg target=_blank>http://img218.imageshack.us/img218/5893/dthomassp2.jpg</a>

    Official thread killer I have heard.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •