Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 31

Thread: Quinn to start versus Oakland

  1. #1
    Member Since
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Milwaukee
    Posts
    2,938
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 60
    Given: 22

    Default Quinn to start versus Oakland


    0 Not allowed!
    Adam Teicher is reporting that Quinn will start this week versus Oakland...Talk about a lose/lose situation (meaning, doesn't matter who was announced as starter).

    Source: https://twitter.com/adamteicher/stat...36965827149824
    Diehard Fan Living in Packer Territory

    Co-Founder: 2 Mugs Fantasy Football -- a site about and football!

  2. #21
    Member Since
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    302
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 15
    Given: 6

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by matthewschiefs View Post
    You want to lose to take a gamble on a rookie QB instead of hoping that Maybe that Brady can be a good qb for us and we can address other needs? Like CB?
    As stated here Quinn won't do a thing just stating the obvious...but I said now is his chance let's see...I am a Notre Dame fan (at least one of my football teams does not blow) so I would love to see him succeed!

  3. #22
    Member Since
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio
    Posts
    691
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 9
    Given: 0

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Don't you find it interesting that the only QB in the Cassel era that could challenge him for the starting spot was Orten, and they dumped him as quick as they could in the off season. Palko was the back up last year, the CFL reject. Now it's Quinn, who I hope really shines. But I don't think they ever expected him to, they didn't seem to want to push Cassel out of the top spot. Just weird.

  4. #23
    Member Since
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    1,529
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 42
    Given: 0

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by drstandley31 View Post
    Don't you find it interesting that the only QB in the Cassel era that could challenge him for the starting spot was Orten, and they dumped him as quick as they could in the off season. Palko was the back up last year, the CFL reject. Now it's Quinn, who I hope really shines. But I don't think they ever expected him to, they didn't seem to want to push Cassel out of the top spot. Just weird.
    when have the CHIEFS ever had a back up push the starter out of a job. Rich gannon would have been the closest but in the end he lost out.
    Official Chiefs Crowd Historian

  5. #24
    Member Since
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio
    Posts
    691
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 9
    Given: 0

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by chiefnut View Post
    when have the CHIEFS ever had a back up push the starter out of a job. Rich gannon would have been the closest but in the end he lost out.
    Hard to argue with.

  6. #25
    Member Since
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Drunken State
    Posts
    3,993
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 48
    Given: 46

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by chiefnut View Post
    when have the CHIEFS ever had a back up push the starter out of a job. Rich gannon would have been the closest but in the end he lost out.
    Doesn't really apply in this case. We got a backup pushing a backup out of a job.
    SHUT IT

  7. #26
    Member Since
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    10,594
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 6
    Given: 3

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    How long before stanzi or cassel get the start again.

  8. #27
    Member Since
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
    Posts
    770
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 19
    Given: 0

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by drstandley31 View Post
    Don't you find it interesting that the only QB in the Cassel era that could challenge him for the starting spot was Orten, and they dumped him as quick as they could in the off season. Palko was the back up last year, the CFL reject. Now it's Quinn, who I hope really shines. But I don't think they ever expected him to, they didn't seem to want to push Cassel out of the top spot. Just weird.
    Palko wasn't even a CFL reject, never played, only was on a teams practice roster for a couple of weeks of playoffs

  9. #28
    Member Since
    Jan 2011
    Location
    VA
    Posts
    231
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by rodu View Post
    Palko wasn't even a CFL reject, never played, only was on a teams practice roster for a couple of weeks of playoffs
    Pioli is always looking for the next Brady or Warner... instead of a Dalton or RG3.

  10. #29
    Member Since
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    1,529
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 42
    Given: 0

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by Bike View Post
    Doesn't really apply in this case. We got a backup pushing a backup out of a job.

    no, the backup [quinn] is not pushing the starter out of a job, cassel got hurt and his playing so bad that quinn is being put in by default. he is not winning the job he just happened to be the #2 and therefore is getting a shot to make things better. when a backup has performed well or has high expectations along with the starter struggling that is when he pushes the starter out. in this case quinn has neither performed well nor was expected to.
    Official Chiefs Crowd Historian

  11. #30
    Member Since
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Miles City, Montana
    Posts
    1,590
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 58
    Given: 120

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Let's just bring Thiggy back....if i recall, he could throw deep

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. If Quinn cant start....
    By LlamaNinja in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 10-03-2012, 09:08 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •