Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Now John Clayton Weighs In On the Chiefs

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Member Since
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,962

    Default Now John Clayton Weighs In On the Chiefs

    He published an article with the 10 worst contracts in the NFL. The Chiefs have two of the players on this list:

    NFL owners have navigated through years of labor battles and escaped without having to fully guarantee contracts. Instead, teams offer huge signing bonuses and partial base salary guarantees to compete.

    To appease fan bases and promote ticket sales, teams will venture into bad contracts. Many will rush to judgment on the Buffalo Bills signing Mario Williams to a six-year, $96 million contract. Through seven games, Williams has 3.5 sacks and 16 tackles.

    But seven games don't define a signing. Julius Peppers had two sacks and 16 tackles in the first seven games of his six-year, $84 million contract with the Bears, and no one is questioning that deal in Chicago.

    Here is my list of the 10 worst current NFL contracts:


    Chris Johnson is set to make $10 million next season, a price John Clayton feels is too steep for a running back who's not among the league leaders.
    1. Chris Johnson, RB, Tennessee Titans (six years, $80.96 million): This might be tough to justify after Johnson's 195-yard effort against Buffalo, but the Bills' defense has been making a lot of money for opposing players. Before Sunday's game, Johnson averaged 50.2 yards over the first six weeks. But in the first year of Johnson's contract, CJ2K was CJ1K, rushing for 1,047 yards and averaging a modest 4.0 yards per carry. Johnson's salary goes from $8 million to $10 million next year. The Titans view the contract as a four-year, $56 million extension, but in a quarterback-driven league, it's tough to pay a running back like a quarterback unless he's among the league leaders.

    2. Michael Vick, QB, Philadelphia Eagles (six years, $100 million): The Eagles are coming off a bye week in which Andy Reid fired defensive coordinator Juan Castillo, and he is evaluating every position. Vick is the quarterback for now, but after the so-called "Dream Team" didn't make the playoffs last season, the 3-3 start has everything under review. Reid could be in trouble if the Eagles don't make the playoffs, and that would affect Vick. He has $47.5 million coming to him in 2013-15, but the Eagles might try to get out of the deal if Reid is gone.

    3. Mark Sanchez, QB, New York Jets (three years, $40.4 million): The Jets aren't "Tebowing" about this contract. Four years into his career, Sanchez is at a career-low 53.2 completion percentage and Rex Ryan has to explain weekly why he doesn't replace Sanchez with Tim Tebow. Though he was part of an AFC Championship Game participant his first two seasons, Sanchez's performance has declined with the shrinking offensive talent around him. The problem is twofold. The Jets are more than $7 million over next year's cap, and Sanchez has a $10 million guarantee in 2013. It would be hard to get rid of him.

    4. Kevin Kolb, QB, Arizona Cardinals (six years, $62.1 million): The Cardinals felt so good about this deal that they stalked Peyton Manning with the idea of upgrading at quarterback. Kolb has looked no better than a backup. He's battled enough injuries that players question his toughness. John Skelton beat out Kolb for the starting job, and even though Kolb was 3-2 filling in for him, Skelton seems to be the better option for the Cardinals.

    5. Matt Cassel, QB, Kansas City Chiefs (six years, $58 million): A good portion of the Kansas City crowd cheered when Cassel suffered a concussion. Cassel has recovered, but he has lost his job to Brady Quinn. This is Cassel's fourth and, most likely, last season in Kansas City. His salaries go to $7.5 million and $9 million in the final two years of his contract, but he's never completed better than 59.5 percent of his passes for better than 6.9 yards an attempt.

    6. DeAngelo Williams, RB, Carolina Panthers (five years, $43 million): The coaching staff thought so much of the $8.6 million-a-year running back that he was on the field for five plays Sunday against Dallas even though he's healthy. He has 50 carries for 177 yards, which puts him on pace for a 472-yard season. The Panthers have sizable investments in two other running backs, Jonathan Stewart at $36.5 million for five years and Mike Tolbert at $10 million for four years. Oh, and by the way, Williams turns 30 next April, making him a target for release.

    7. Tyson Jackson, DE, Kansas City Chiefs (five years, $56.2 million): Scott Pioli drafted Jackson with the third pick of the 2009 draft to be a mainstay in the Chiefs’ 3-4 defense. The problem is that Jackson and Glenn Dorsey come off the field when opponents go to three- and four-receiver sets. In only one game this season has Jackson been on the field for more than 40 plays. He has two sacks and 139 tackles in four seasons and his salary goes to $14.72 million next year, the final year of his contract.


    Source: Worst NFL contracts: No running from CJ2K - Sports Business News, Analysis - Dollars Blog - ESPN Playbook - ESPN

  2. #2
    Member Since
    Oct 2011
    Location
    St Petersburg FL
    Posts
    331

    Default

    Good thing management isn't included on this or we'd have 3 on the list with Pioli on it too.
    Doing my best to keep my sons memory alive!!!

  3. #3
    Member Since
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    10,594

    Default

    Incredible.

  4. #4
    Member Since
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    22,845

    Default

    Crennel as HC should be on that list.


  5. #5
    Member Since
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    10,594

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Coach View Post
    Crennel as HC should be on that list.
    Was his contact worth that much?

  6. #6
    Member Since
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    33

    Default

    Can't really argue with him. 2 sacks in four years? Jackson is bust-tastic, and if Dontari follows in his footsteps I'll lose my mind. Maybe THAT will be the final mistake that runs Pioli out of KC.

  7. #7
    Member Since
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,973

    Default

    They conveniently fail to mention that TJax's contract (IIRC) has no guarantees for next year. So basically, the Chiefs can force him to renegotiate a more reasonable contract or cut him at no cost. There is likely no way he plays under his current contract.

    Who cares if he has 2 sacks. His job is to take up 2 pass blockers so that Houston and Hali can get sacks and stuff the run. They both seem to be doing well in the sack department. Last year he was the best run stuffing DE in the league according to PFF.

  8. #8
    Member Since
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Columbia
    Posts
    915

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jap1 View Post
    They conveniently fail to mention that TJax's contract (IIRC) has no guarantees for next year. So basically, the Chiefs can force him to renegotiate a more reasonable contract or cut him at no cost. There is likely no way he plays under his current contract.

    Who cares if he has 2 sacks. His job is to take up 2 pass blockers so that Houston and Hali can get sacks and stuff the run. They both seem to be doing well in the sack department. Last year he was the best run stuffing DE in the league according to PFF.

    Thanks for mentioning this on TJ's contract. I was thinking that I read this somewhere.

    Secondly, You are right, TJ has been better then most on this forumn would give credit for. Most here do not really understand a 3 4 defense. The front three are not expected to get sacks, and most here only rate them by sacks.

    All this being said, I was very disappointed when we drafted TJ. But he still deserves to be recognized for his accomplishments.

  9. #9
    Member Since
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,962

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jap1 View Post
    They conveniently fail to mention that TJax's contract (IIRC) has no guarantees for next year. So basically, the Chiefs can force him to renegotiate a more reasonable contract or cut him at no cost. There is likely no way he plays under his current contract.

    Who cares if he has 2 sacks. His job is to take up 2 pass blockers so that Houston and Hali can get sacks and stuff the run. They both seem to be doing well in the sack department. Last year he was the best run stuffing DE in the league according to PFF.
    All absolutely true. We could still use a little more production from him in the pass rush department.

  10. #10
    Member Since
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    10,594

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jap1 View Post
    They conveniently fail to mention that TJax's contract (IIRC) has no guarantees for next year. So basically, the Chiefs can force him to renegotiate a more reasonable contract or cut him at no cost. There is likely no way he plays under his current contract.

    Who cares if he has 2 sacks. His job is to take up 2 pass blockers so that Houston and Hali can get sacks and stuff the run. They both seem to be doing well in the sack department. Last year he was the best run stuffing DE in the league according to PFF.
    Very true. But #3 overall.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-12-2009, 12:39 AM
  2. Clayton at Chiefs Training Camp
    By tornadospotter in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 08-09-2009, 12:08 PM
  3. John Clayton says Crennel still a possibility despite Gibbs/Pendergast
    By yashi in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 02-18-2009, 08:00 PM
  4. John Clayton reports..................
    By Drunker Hillbilly in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 10-24-2008, 10:10 PM
  5. John Clayton reports......
    By DrunkHillbilly in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 08-14-2007, 12:50 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •