Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 26 of 26

Thread: How LITTLE would you take to trade down?

  1. #1
    Member Since
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,108
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 86
    Given: 135

    Default How LITTLE would you take to trade down?


    0 Not allowed!
    So, it is not a secret that the Chiefs are strongly considering moving down in the draft and that we are interested in Joeckel and Fisher.

    In the top 4 only us and Philly need an OT, which means we could drop as low as 4 and still get either Joeckel or Fisher.

    Would you be willing to only swap 1sts and get someone's 2nd round pick to move down a couple spots? Or would you want something that would match up the point values.

    I would tak the 2nd if that's all I could get. My logic is if you can move down and still get your man, why not get something out of it. Say Jax wants Geno, and wants to keep us from trading with others. We move down one spot (with everyone still on the board), and get the top pick in the 2nd round. Why NOT make that move (especially if its the only offer)? Am I crazy to think this way?

  2. #21
    Member Since
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    4,225
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 580
    Given: 770

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by Justin5772002 View Post
    What if this regimes plans have been to drum up interest in the 2 tackles so we can trade down? We don't really need a Lt we have Albert and maybe he's just playing the game to help the chiefs also. Only one more week till we all find out!!!
    Fat chance. If that were the case, they'd have already handed Albert a long-term contract before they started signing FA's. But they didn't, because they know he's not a top 10 LT, and yet, wants top 5 LT money.

  3. #22
    Member Since
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Milwaukee
    Posts
    2,959
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 60
    Given: 22

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    I'd trade down to 4 with Philly just to get their 2nd and another later round pick. One of Fisher, Joeckel, or Dion Jordan will be available, assuming they take Geno.

    That said, nobody seems willing to move up.
    Last edited by Ryfo18; 04-19-2013 at 05:50 PM.
    Diehard Fan Living in Packer Territory

    Co-Founder: 2 Mugs Fantasy Football -- a site about and football!

  4. #23
    Member Since
    Jun 2005
    Location
    San Antonio, TX
    Posts
    3,761
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 180
    Given: 51

    Default


    1 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by Ryfo18 View Post
    I'd trade down to 4 with Philly just to get their 2nd and another later round pick. One of Fisher, Joeckel, or Dion Jordan will be available, assuming they take Geno.

    That said, nobody seems willing to move up.

    Crazy, right? You'd think with so many QB-needy teams in the top 10, ONE of them would realize how AMAZING Geno Smith is...

  5. #24
    Member Since
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,108
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 86
    Given: 135

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    So, the jets-bucs trade for Revis went through. I wonder if the Jets will be interested in moving up with us now that they have 2 1st round picks.

  6. #25
    Member Since
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    4,225
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 580
    Given: 770

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by jap1 View Post
    So, the jets-bucs trade for Revis went through. I wonder if the Jets will be interested in moving up with us now that they have 2 1st round picks.
    Until proven wrong, I don't believe they will. I don't think they will be willing to trade both of those picks to go up to #1 to take Geno Smith. They more than likely might trade down with one of them.

    Besides, if the Chiefs are able to trade Albert for a 2nd or 3rd round pick, I believe they'd be better served to just stay at #1 and take Joeckel or Fisher.
    Last edited by brdempsey69; 04-21-2013 at 05:57 PM.

  7. #26
    Member Since
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,108
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 86
    Given: 135

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by brdempsey69 View Post
    Until proven wrong, I don't believe they will. I don't think they will be willing to trade both of those picks to go up to #1 to take Geno Smith. They more than likely might trade down with one of them.

    Besides, if the Chiefs are able to trade Albert for a 2nd or 3rd round pick, I believe they'd be better served to just stay at #1 and take Joeckel or Fisher.
    I agree it is not likely, and if we do make the trade for Albert, wouldn't want to make this trade.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Similar Threads

  1. Trade or let go?
    By lordchillz in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 12-06-2010, 12:46 AM
  2. If we 3 way trade it'll be now
    By Rodgers4MVP in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 09-07-2009, 07:51 AM
  3. Please NO trade!!!!
    By balto in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 10-15-2008, 01:24 PM
  4. TRADE? KEEP? OR let go for nothing, that is the ?
    By wolfpack in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 51
    Last Post: 07-01-2007, 08:08 PM
  5. TRADE! TRADE! TRADE! Building for the Future
    By Cisco Kid in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 04-26-2007, 07:15 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •