Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 28

Thread: Travis Kelce, Welcome to KC!

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Member Since
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,107
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 85
    Given: 135

    Default Travis Kelce, Welcome to KC!


    0 Not allowed!
    Our 1st 3rd round pick is Travis Kelce, TE, Cincinatti.

    Looks like Alex Smith has gotten his Vernon Davis.

  2. #2
    Member Since
    Jun 2005
    Location
    San Antonio, TX
    Posts
    3,760
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 179
    Given: 51

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Gronk comps are nice.

  3. #3
    Member Since
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    14,154
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 82
    Given: 27

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Surprised we took a TE. Story of the draft is how far QB's are sliding. Who would have guessed Barkley who could have been a lottery pick last year, now falls into possible 4th rd.


  4. #4
    Member Since
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
    Posts
    776
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 20
    Given: 0

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    I was hoping we would take a TE as soon as we could, they are important in Reid's offense

  5. #5
    Member Since
    Sep 2008
    Location
    kansas city
    Posts
    2,060
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 85
    Given: 46

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    he was suspended a year for smoking pot. sure hope this is behind him
    trust but verify
    http://www.chiefscrowd.com/forums/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=1540&dateline=1380047  325]

  6. #6
    Member Since
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    14,154
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 82
    Given: 27

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by rodu View Post
    I was hoping we would take a TE as soon as we could, they are important in Reid's offense
    For me, I just don't get it. We brought in Fasano. We already had Moeaki. We hadn't picked in two rounds. There had to be better players available at bigger positions of need than a TE. I hope I'm wrong, but to me this was a big head scratcher. Grab a TE for depth in the 6th or 7th.

    Take a look at the guys that were taken in the 3rd round alone after Kelce was selected.
    http://www.sbnation.com/nfl/2013/4/2...hieu-cardinals
    Last edited by Coach; 04-28-2013 at 09:31 PM.


  7. #7
    Member Since
    Jun 2005
    Location
    San Antonio, TX
    Posts
    3,760
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 179
    Given: 51

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by Coach View Post
    Surprised we took a TE. Story of the draft is how far QB's are sliding. Who would have guessed Barkley who could have been a lottery pick last year, now falls into possible 4th rd.

    "lottery pick?" lol


    Quote Originally Posted by Coach View Post
    For me, I just don't get it. We brought in Fasano. We already had Moeaki. We hadn't picked in two rounds. There had to be better players available at bigger positions of need than a TE. I hope I'm wrong, but to me this was a big head scratcher. Grab a TE for depth in the 6th or 7th.

    Take a look at the guys that were take in the 3rd round alone after Kelce was selected.
    http://www.sbnation.com/nfl/2013/4/2...hieu-cardinals
    Again, if you take this administration at their word of drafting "bpa" instead of trying to fill holes, it actually makes sense.

  8. #8
    Member Since
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    14,154
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 82
    Given: 27

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by texaschief View Post
    "lottery pick?" lol




    Again, if you take this administration at their word of drafting "bpa" instead of trying to fill holes, it actually makes sense.
    So you think Kelce is better than all of the players that were taken later that round?


  9. #9
    Member Since
    Jun 2005
    Location
    San Antonio, TX
    Posts
    3,760
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 179
    Given: 51

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by Coach View Post
    So you think Kelce is better than all of the players that were taken later that round?

    Doesn't matter what I think. What matters is what THEIR board says. There were evaluations out there that thought Kelce was the best TE in the draft, talent wise. If the Chiefs don't care about the off the field BS that probably made him fall, then why not pull the trigger? This is a head coach that signed Mike Vick. Character issues don't seem to bother this guy. If the talent is there, take the guy. I hadn't even heard of the guy coming into the draft, so I don't really have an opinion on the pick as far as value is concerned.

  10. #10
    Member Since
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    866
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 49
    Given: 10

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by Coach View Post
    For me, I just don't get it. We brought in Fasano. We already had Moeaki. We hadn't picked in two rounds. There had to be better players available at bigger positions of need than a TE. I hope I'm wrong, but to me this was a big head scratcher. Grab a TE for depth in the 6th or 7th.

    Take a look at the guys that were taken in the 3rd round alone after Kelce was selected.
    http://www.sbnation.com/nfl/2013/4/2...hieu-cardinals

    Even though I think it was a bit high I like the pick. Moeaki just has not been the same since his knee injury.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Sign Travis LaBoy
    By DT14PRIEST in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 05-01-2009, 02:03 AM
  2. Chiefs sign CB Travis Daniels
    By ThigpenFan in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 03-13-2009, 02:27 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •