Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 20

Thread: NFL Discussion

  1. #1
    Member Since
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Miles City, Montana
    Posts
    2,115

    Default NFL Discussion

    As much as I love to talk about the Chiefs, sometimes they are not doing much to warrant a discussion, so I thought a NFL thread would be great. Coach, if you feel this doesn't belond here, then go ahead and move it or lock it up. Use this thread for other teams/players news and other game discussions.

  2. #2
    Member Since
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Miles City, Montana
    Posts
    2,115

    Default

    So Rodgers just got paid, do you think Andrew Luck, RGIII or Russel Wilson will break that number when their contract talk comes up (or Kaep)

  3. #3
    Member Since
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,962

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by doobs_05 View Post
    So Rodgers just got paid, do you think Andrew Luck, RGIII or Russel Wilson will break that number when their contract talk comes up (or Kaep)
    Yes.

  4. #4
    Member Since
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Miles City, Montana
    Posts
    2,115

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ryfo18 View Post
    Yes.
    Will they ever limit the amount a player can be paid you think?

  5. #5
    Member Since
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Miles City, Montana
    Posts
    2,115

    Default

    Also what are your guys thoughts on the Redskins changing their name, does it need to happen?

  6. #6
    Member Since
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,962

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by doobs_05 View Post
    Will they ever limit the amount a player can be paid you think?
    I doubt this ever happens. I'm sure that the NFLPA would never agree to something like that.

  7. #7
    Member Since
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,973

    Default

    Supposedly there was a new poll out that people would be willing to accept a change of name to the Redtails (as in a redtail hawk). It would let them keep the feathers on their logo, as well as their team colors, but be more PC.

    Im kinda torn on it. I think it is insulting. I mean, you wouldnt allow a team to be called the LA wetbacks, San Fran Chinks, Georgia N-words, etc and it is pretty much the same thing. That having been said, I dont think redskin is actually used as a slur against Native Americans anymore (then again I am not connected to the Native American community). I wouldnt be opposed to a change, and I think it is just a matter of time for when it will happen.

    I also dont think this has any implications on the Chiefs. Chiefs is a title in Native American culture, it isnt an insult, so I would think we would be ok. This argument came up in my high school (The Braves) and it got shot down because of the fact that a brave was honorable (As long as we didnt have a mascot that made an idiot of himself dressed in native american garb).

    I know the team/NFL/ apparel companies do not want the change because it would come at a huge cost of re-designing logos, merchandise, discarded of already manufactured merchandise, etc.

  8. #8
    Member Since
    Feb 2012
    Location
    earth
    Posts
    33

    Default The STRONGHOLD

    Quote Originally Posted by jap1 View Post
    Supposedly there was a new poll out that people would be willing to accept a change of name to the Redtails (as in a redtail hawk). It would let them keep the feathers on their logo, as well as their team colors, but be more PC.

    Im kinda torn on it. I think it is insulting. I mean, you wouldnt allow a team to be called the LA wetbacks, San Fran Chinks, Georgia N-words, etc and it is pretty much the same thing. That having been said, I dont think redskin is actually used as a slur against Native Americans anymore (then again I am not connected to the Native American community). I wouldnt be opposed to a change, and I think it is just a matter of time for when it will happen.

    I also dont think this has any implications on the Chiefs. Chiefs is a title in Native American culture, it isnt an insult, so I would think we would be ok. This argument came up in my high school (The Braves) and it got shot down because of the fact that a brave was honorable (As long as we didnt have a mascot that made an idiot of himself dressed in native american garb).

    I know the team/NFL/ apparel companies do not want the change because it would come at a huge cost of re-designing logos, merchandise, discarded of already manufactured merchandise, etc.
    I think they should change it to the Washington Americans, and keep the logo and colors.

  9. #9
    Member Since
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Miles City, Montana
    Posts
    2,115

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jap1 View Post
    Supposedly there was a new poll out that people would be willing to accept a change of name to the Redtails (as in a redtail hawk). It would let them keep the feathers on their logo, as well as their team colors, but be more PC.

    Im kinda torn on it. I think it is insulting. I mean, you wouldnt allow a team to be called the LA wetbacks, San Fran Chinks, Georgia N-words, etc and it is pretty much the same thing. That having been said, I dont think redskin is actually used as a slur against Native Americans anymore (then again I am not connected to the Native American community). I wouldnt be opposed to a change, and I think it is just a matter of time for when it will happen.

    I also dont think this has any implications on the Chiefs. Chiefs is a title in Native American culture, it isnt an insult, so I would think we would be ok. This argument came up in my high school (The Braves) and it got shot down because of the fact that a brave was honorable (As long as we didnt have a mascot that made an idiot of himself dressed in native american garb).

    I know the team/NFL/ apparel companies do not want the change because it would come at a huge cost of re-designing logos, merchandise, discarded of already manufactured merchandise, etc.
    Redskins is not used as a slur here in montana ( i will not state what people do use). I was okay with the name, but i do see where people are coming from with the name being bad. North Dakota just made the Fighting Sioux change their name, and i don't see a problem with that name, but i'm white and have not walked a mile in native american shoes.

    Also, I think the ATL Braves are not allowed to use the screaming indian logo anymore

  10. #10
    Member Since
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,973

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SBV_Eagle_Bull View Post
    I think they should change it to the Washington Americans, and keep the logo and colors.
    First time I read that I thought, how could you keep the logo and colors, wouldn't it make more sense to change it to red white and blue. Then I realized that you meant it that way, since Native Americans are the ORIGINAL Americans (hence the native part, duh). Ironically, I know a lot of ignorant and bigoted people (none of them i consider friends) who would have a sh!t fit if they did that. Then again I like pissing them off, so I'm all for it!

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. kc vs az game discussion
    By Lord-Chiefy in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 133
    Last Post: 08-13-2012, 09:35 AM
  2. Official Live Draft Discussion Thread
    By TopekaRoy in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 263
    Last Post: 04-29-2012, 04:46 PM
  3. Faiders / Sparklers game discussion
    By Pro_Angler in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 125
    Last Post: 12-13-2010, 11:05 AM
  4. **Official Draft Discussion**
    By texaschief in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 67
    Last Post: 01-11-2010, 12:04 AM
  5. Cowboys fan here for serious game discussion...
    By Bluestar76 in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 50
    Last Post: 10-12-2009, 09:52 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •