Page 5 of 24 FirstFirst 12345678915 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 231

Thread: One more why not try Croyle thread.

  1. #1
    Member Since
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Illinois... No longer .. Finally back home Blue Springs MO
    Posts
    2,417

    Default One more why not try Croyle thread.

    I am posting this in the locker room, partially because it is not really Chiefs chat, although it kinda is.

    I am catching some static, for calling for Huard to sit and to bring in Croyle. So I thought I would put up some stats to back up my contention that Huard isn't doing that great.

    In the game between KC and Oakland. KC Won yes good job guys way to get it done.
    now the numbers.

    Huard 16 of 31 177 Yards 0 Touchdowns. That is barely 50 percent.
    Culpepper 18 of 29 228 Yards 1 TD
    Culpepper won in every stat against Huard this week.

    But that was one game. Or was it.

    Huard 24th in Passer Rating at 79.8 this is probably before the Oakland Game also which may have brought this down. In passer rating he is behind other QBs such as Joey Harrington, Jay Cutler, Dante Culpepper, Chad Pennington, and Jon Kitna to name a few.

    Completion percentage he is faring a little better, He is at 64.2 Percent. This is 15th in the league, still only average. Again behind Pennington, who NY fans are calling for his head big time.

    Not bad in Yards, 11th, at 1470 yards, but this is with 8th in Attempts, 14 attempts behind Tom Brady, and well we all know what kind of a year he is having. His yardage is 2125 But again he is on a tear and I wouldnt expect anyone to match him at the moment.

    Yards per catch is 6.8 this is 23rd, I don't know that I hold this against Huard as much as I hold it against whoever is calling the plays.

    Yards per game Huard 20th

    OK all the Huard fanboys are talking about You cant throw interceptions. In this category lets see where. Ol Damon Lands, oooooh he is tied for 6th most interceptions in the NFL, and again that may have been before the Oakland Game where he didn't throw any, so he might have allowed a few people to pass him in INTs. BTW this is more Int's then Harrington who was benched.

    Huard is tied for 4th in the number of times sacked, at 18. I dont know whether to say this is because of the line or if it is because he is not mobile enough.

    Now these numbers are after last year Huard had a second best in the NFL passer rating of 98. He clearly isn't playing as good this year. Ohhh and BTW I was calling for Trent Green (Who I have a ton of respect for and think the world of) to sit last year and let Huard continue.

    2006 Huard 11 TDs 1 INT
    2007 Huard 6 TDs 7 INT

    I have been defending myself on why I want to see Croyle all year, I have said game in and game out Huard isn't getting it done. I have been flamed time and time again for my opinion and called a Huard Hater. I am sorry you made me do this.

    But it is time for the end of the Huard Era and time for the Croyle Era to begin.

    Your Witness.




  2. #41
    Member Since
    May 2006
    Posts
    5,092

    Default

    This thread is a wreck.
    THAT quarterback is NOT a Pro Bowl quarterback. Never was and never will be.

  3. #42
    Member Since
    Sep 2007
    Location
    RIGHT NEXT TO ARROWHEAD!
    Posts
    18,752

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Guru View Post
    This thread is a wreck.
    What did you expect from the title of the thread?

    It is either argue Huard vs Broyle, or make jokes.

    There won't be any real news about the Chiefs for about 10 days...

    How do you propose we entertain the masses?

    Don't fiddle while Rome burns dude!
    http://arrowheadjunkies.com/pictures/PhotoShop/sig_pics/NFL_Players/kansas_city_chiefs/tyson.jackson/062009/tyson.jackson.500.png

  4. #43
    Member Since
    Sep 2007
    Location
    iowa
    Posts
    640

    Default

    Sorry ...hahahahaha. all I can say.

  5. #44
    Member Since
    May 2006
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    9,152

    Default

    As far as I am concerned, Huard has done a pretty good job with what he has. One week, the argument is that the stats don't tell the whole story. Then, the following week, the argument turns to let's examine the stats.

    Few QBs would be able to perform much better with our offensive line, gameplanning, overall offensive philosophy, no running game, and a great wideout who is a rookie and may not be entirely familiar with the playbook.

  6. #45
    Member Since
    Sep 2007
    Location
    RIGHT NEXT TO ARROWHEAD!
    Posts
    18,752

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Polleo Pit Man View Post
    Sorry ...hahahahaha. all I can say.
    This one is wise...
    http://arrowheadjunkies.com/pictures/PhotoShop/sig_pics/NFL_Players/kansas_city_chiefs/tyson.jackson/062009/tyson.jackson.500.png

  7. #46
    Member Since
    Sep 2007
    Location
    RIGHT NEXT TO ARROWHEAD!
    Posts
    18,752

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chief31 View Post
    As far as I am concerned, Huard has done a pretty good job with what he has. One week, the argument is that the stats don't tell the whole story. Then, the following week, the argument turns to let's examine the stats.

    Few QBs would be able to perform much better with our offensive line, gameplanning, overall offensive philosophy, no running game, and a great wideout who is a rookie and may not be entirely familiar with the playbook.
    Wow.

    chief31 went to the "Sum the Team Up with One Statement" seminar.

    This my friends is the post of the month.

    Where you just waiting for the bye week to explain it?

    Seriously?

    You quit arguing with nOObs and decided to come to the Light Side?

    Now how do I do that Post of the Month thingy again?

    http://arrowheadjunkies.com/pictures/PhotoShop/sig_pics/NFL_Players/kansas_city_chiefs/tyson.jackson/062009/tyson.jackson.500.png

  8. #47
    Member Since
    May 2006
    Posts
    5,092

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chief31 View Post
    As far as I am concerned, Huard has done a pretty good job with what he has. One week, the argument is that the stats don't tell the whole story. Then, the following week, the argument turns to let's examine the stats.

    Few QBs would be able to perform much better with our offensive line, gameplanning, overall offensive philosophy, no running game, and a great wideout who is a rookie and may not be entirely familiar with the playbook.
    Well, stats don't tell the whole story so lets look at the stats from a different vantage point.

    Oh, whats an offensive philosophy anyway?
    THAT quarterback is NOT a Pro Bowl quarterback. Never was and never will be.

  9. #48
    Member Since
    Sep 2007
    Location
    iowa
    Posts
    640

    Default

    lol. Do i need to suit up with full pads for this thread? still lmao!

  10. #49
    Member Since
    May 2006
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    9,152

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Guru View Post
    Well, stats don't tell the whole story so lets look at the stats from a different vantage point.

    Oh, whats an offensive philosophy anyway?
    Herm???? I thought you didn't use the interweb thingy.

  11. #50
    Member Since
    Sep 2007
    Location
    RIGHT NEXT TO ARROWHEAD!
    Posts
    18,752

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chief31 View Post
    As far as I am concerned, Huard has done a pretty good job with what he has. One week, the argument is that the stats don't tell the whole story. Then, the following week, the argument turns to let's examine the stats.

    Few QBs would be able to perform much better with our offensive line, gameplanning, overall offensive philosophy, no running game, and a great wideout who is a rookie and may not be entirely familiar with the playbook.
    Quote Originally Posted by Guru View Post
    Well, stats don't tell the whole story so lets look at the stats from a different vantage point.

    Oh, whats an offensive philosophy anyway?
    Will the Broyle=Huard thing ever end?

    Will it happen by a change of QB?

    Will that QB even be Broyle?

    Is the management that sure of Broyle that it is a done deal that he will be the future, or are they confident that Huard can manage the game until they can aquire another trade for a retiring QB?

    OR!!! Will they use the draft picks for O linemen and then use Broyle?

    This is a transparent organization at the time.

    LJ won't even talk to the press.

    HERM won't even make speeches that are entertaining (yesterdays was interesting, you should watch it).

    The Chiefs are becoming the Bush administration...

    http://arrowheadjunkies.com/pictures/PhotoShop/sig_pics/NFL_Players/kansas_city_chiefs/tyson.jackson/062009/tyson.jackson.500.png

Page 5 of 24 FirstFirst 12345678915 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •