Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 31 to 34 of 34

Thread: trade down with Jacks Jags

  1. #1
    Member Since
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    132
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 5
    Given: 0

    Default trade down with Jacks Jags


    0 Not allowed!
    send #23 to jacksonville for #39,#105,#114,#150 and #222
    or #39,#70 and #222?
    used draftsite.com to select players still available at each pick
    #39 van noy(lb) d bucannon(s) j ward(s) l joyner(s) yankey(g) tuitt(de)
    #87 davante adams(wr)
    #105 billy turner(ot)
    #114 demarcus lawrence(olb)
    i will add i dont believe adams< turner or d lawrence will fall to these spots
    #124 d dozier(g) phillip gaines(cb)
    #150 larry webster or caraun reid
    #163 possibly select injured prospect here say aaron colvin or brandon thomas
    #193 dowling(s)
    #200 matt patchan(ot)
    #222 colt lylera(te)

  2. #31
    Member Since
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    172
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 21
    Given: 51

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by ctchiefsfan View Post
    ABSOLUTELY! I'd have been VERY FOOLISH to have said that Dressler was sure to make an impact for the Chiefs. But then, I DID'T say that. What I DID say was "...his skills may or may not translate to the NFL."


    Meanwhile you DID refer to someone on the Chiefs as a "CFL reject". And since Dressler is, to the best of my knowledge, the only player on the Chiefs who came from the CFL, I can only conclude you were referring to Dressler. And whatever Dressler accomplishes for the Chiefs, he is most certainly NOT a CFL reject.

    My statement was accurate. Yours was utter nonsense.
    My post, that you quoted, explained that "reject" was a strong choice of words. The content of the message delivered is not nonsense. The Chiefs are banking on a lot of probable crap making a difference. Apparently you'd rather harp on minor details because you don't want to hear it.
    ...in my opinion

  3. #32
    Member Since
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Falls Village, Ct
    Posts
    3,531
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 325
    Given: 326

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Tell you what....Lets write off my use of the word "fool" and your use of the phrase "CFL reject" as beer talk (whether it was or wasn't) and move on. Fair enough?

  4. #33
    Member Since
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    172
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 21
    Given: 51

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by ctchiefsfan View Post
    Tell you what....Lets write off my use of the word "fool" and your use of the phrase "CFL reject" as beer talk (whether it was or wasn't) and move on. Fair enough?
    Cool Beans
    ...in my opinion

  5. #34
    Member Since
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Falls Village, Ct
    Posts
    3,531
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 325
    Given: 326

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Good deal. Plenty of stuff I don't agree with you on, but there is no point in a couple of Chiefs fans getting in a fight over 3 poorly selected words.

    We now return you to your regularly scheduled programming which will soon be supplanted by arguments over the draft choices we make.

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234

Similar Threads

  1. Jags.......
    By SIC J in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 10-22-2010, 04:38 PM
  2. Jags vs Broncos GDT
    By Three7s in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 09-13-2010, 01:43 PM
  3. Taylor Cut by the Jags
    By tornadospotter in forum The Locker Room
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 02-18-2009, 10:20 AM
  4. TRADE! TRADE! TRADE! Building for the Future
    By Cisco Kid in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 04-26-2007, 07:15 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •