0

Thumbs Up |
Received: 7 Given: 0 |
send #23 to jacksonville for #39,#105,#114,#150 and #222
or #39,#70 and #222?
used draftsite.com to select players still available at each pick
#39 van noy(lb) d bucannon(s) j ward(s) l joyner(s) yankey(g) tuitt(de)
#87 davante adams(wr)
#105 billy turner(ot)
#114 demarcus lawrence(olb)
i will add i dont believe adams< turner or d lawrence will fall to these spots
#124 d dozier(g) phillip gaines(cb)
#150 larry webster or caraun reid
#163 possibly select injured prospect here say aaron colvin or brandon thomas
#193 dowling(s)
#200 matt patchan(ot)
#222 colt lylera(te)
Thumbs Up |
Received: 7 Given: 0 |
a guy i keep forgetting about if we trade down and acquire extra late round picks is JOHN URSCHEL g from penn state
he is going to be a solid pro...like him in the 6th
Thumbs Up |
Received: 919 Given: 2,585 |
I don't follow college ball so I'm not fit to say who we should try to trade down with, but with this years draft seeming so deep, trading down for a couple of extra picks seems like a no-brainer and seems to play right to Dorsey's supposed strength at finding talent deep in the draft. So I am certainly hoping we can find someone to buy our pick at #23.
I personally would like to keep our first round draft pick. I am not keen on trading back into the second round unless we get a next years first round pick included.
I am perfectly fine trading back a couple spots to get a second, but would really love to keep our first.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 21 Given: 51 |
I think the Chiefs are in the catbird seat to trade back to early R2 with a team that passed on a QB in picks 1-10. I don’t think you can expect a 15r01 in return, but you might get an early R3 from a team like HOU or MIN, who may not want to wait for their QB in R2. The Chiefs should still able to get a WR, maybe Stephon Tuitt, or their pick of the guards
...in my opinion
Thumbs Up |
Received: 21 Given: 51 |
probably. But it's not like he is a bad WR. He was a 3rd rounder before the 40. But now you look at the big stature and combine that with the fast 40 and you got an intriguing prospect. I would still hesitate to take him at 23 but, in a trade down scenario, if the Chiefs took him in the early 2nd or even late 1st, I would be call it a good roll of dice.
I still don't get it. Why would you want to trade away your best most valueable pick to possibly find an immediate starter, to a 2nd round pick that most seem to think are good Values for a second which screams to me BACK up first year with potention to being a starter or bust.
I see people saying we could get guys in the 2nd round that may here are wanting in the 1st round. Really, Why are we even considering them as our first round pick if you are saying we could get them 15 picks later.
I would rather trade up in the second then trade back.
Bookmarks