I hope not...

[hermhater]

Pennington Could End Up In Kansas City?30th October, 2007 - 12:46 pmNFL.com - It’s unlikely Chad Pennington will be willing to return to New York knowing that he is not the Jets' quarterback of the future. Instead, Pennington will want to position himself with a team where he has a chance to start –- just like Kurt Warner did first with the New York Giants, then the Arizona Cardinals.

Pennington is expected to surface on a team that is grooming a young quarterback not yet ready to play. There are two logical possibilities. The most intriguing is the Kansas City Chiefs, where Pennington would be reunited with his former Jets head coach, Herm Edwards.

The others would be the Minnesota Vikings, a team that already has added former Jets quarterback Brooks Bollinger, and the Carolina Panthers, who recently brought in another former Jets quarterback, Vinny Testaverde.

http://realgmfootball.com/src_wireta...n_kansas_city/

[hermhater]

I think CP would shut Herm down on this one. I hope so, anyway.

Ditto.

[CHIEFS_FN_ROCK]

Yeah CP would be bad. they might as well bring Trent back he got his bell rung again he prob wouldnt even know he left for miami. I was never a green fan at all. You look up the word goofy in the dictionary......theres TRENT!!!

[McLovin]

I respect your opinion and you obviously know more than me about the Packers D, so I defer.

I was not rooting for the change, only repeating a rumor.

I am rooting for a change, HH get a backbone and stand up to them, just cause they have a crush on Huard dont make it right.

[hermhater]

There has been a rumor that Broyle will start this weekend against the Packers...

That would be interesting eh?

Two gunslingers out there on the field duking it out?

That would be crazy. The GB defense has two good press corners who can be beat by a patient QB that makes good reads...a gunslinger will get picked off against their D. If they were going to start Croyle the week to do so would've been against the soft Cincy Defense. I have to think the job is Huard's until they're eliminated or he completely gaffs a couple games.

I respect your opinion and you obviously know more than me about the Packers D, so I defer.

I was not rooting for the change, only repeating a rumor.

I am rooting for a change, HH get a backbone and stand up to them, just cause they have a crush on Huard dont make it right.

With the way the rest of the offense is playing right now I don't know that putting in Broyle would help or hurt us.

I think it is the only the we CAN do at this point to change things up.

Whether it hurts us or harms us will remain to be seen.

If the rumor is true, we will find out Sunday against the Peckers!

If they do put in Broyle and he stinks it up, I will not be responsible for eating crow until I see him play at least six games against starting D's.

At this point in the season the best thing for the team seems to be letting him sit (or rather stand and hold a clipboard, what ever they are calling it these days) and when the season is lost throw him to the wolves.

Huard has made some pretty good decisions, he just looks like a granny on the field.

I was amazed at those two escapes he made from the Gayders dlinemen, and one of them got us the biggest play of the game (not considering Pages int at the end).

[sling58]

I heard they were college roommates in 1492!!

Hey Vinny Hey Chiefster

FYP, you got the dates wrong.

[rbedgood]

I heard they were college roommates in 1842 B.C!!

Hey Vinny Hey Chiefster

FYP, you got the dates wrong.

Ummm...FYP again..

[Indianscalper]

That would be crazy. The GB defense has two good press corners who can be beat by a patient QB that makes good reads...a gunslinger will get picked off against their D. If they were going to start Croyle the week to do so would've been against the soft Cincy Defense. I have to think the job is Huard's until they're eliminated or he completely gaffs a couple games.

The problem with a patient QB against the Packers corners is then he'll have our O line on top of him, Kampan especially is having another great season, 7 sacks, and seems to be getting better as the season wears on...our corners are aggressive, so yes, they do over committ and get too many penelties, but that's all part of the aggressiveness, you can't have one without the other...it's like having a wife who's a the most spectacular whore in the bedroom...you wonder where she learned all of that and you keep pushing to the back of your mind, try not to think of it :)
cj

[luv]

The problem with a patient QB against the Packers corners is then he'll have our O line on top of him, Kampan especially is having another great season, 7 sacks, and seems to be getting better as the season wears on...our corners are aggressive, so yes, they do over committ and get too many penelties, but that's all part of the aggressiveness, you can't have one without the other...it's like having a wife who's a the most spectacular whore in the bedroom...you wonder where she learned all of that and you keep pushing to the back of your mind, try not to think of it :)
cj

How is your O line going to be all over our QB?

[Chiefster]

How is your O line going to be all over our QB?

They must really like Huard in a special way.

[hermhater]

The problem with a patient QB against the Packers corners is then he'll have our O line on top of him, Kampan especially is having another great season, 7 sacks, and seems to be getting better as the season wears on...our corners are aggressive, so yes, they do over committ and get too many penelties, but that's all part of the aggressiveness, you can't have one without the other...it's like having a wife who's a the most spectacular whore in the bedroom...you wonder where she learned all of that and you keep pushing to the back of your mind, try not to think of it :)
cj

How is your O line going to be all over our QB?

They must really like Huard in a special way.

LMAO!!!!!!!

Good one Chiefster!