Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: Depth EVERYWHERE

  1. #1
    Member Since
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    8,866

    Default Depth EVERYWHERE

    RB - Charles, West, Ware and Reaves Obviously the 4 headed monster is gonna be awesome

    WR - Maclin, Conley, Wilson, Robinson, Williams, Streater, Hill, Mathews, Cook, Brown, Hammond and Moore, I wish we could keep the first 9 Mathews is an undrafted monster, year 2 for Cook and Brown

    TE - Kelce, Harris, O'Shaughnessy, Parker and Ross

    Oline - Fisher, Ehinger, Morse, Reid, Schwartz, Fulton, LDT, Sterup, Pughsley, Nowak, Devey, Munyer, Mayweather, and Feigt
    Finally we have depth and quality depth at Oline we haven't had that in years

    Dline - Bailey, Howard, Poe, Jones, King, Roches, Williams, King, Staten, Davis and Ta'amu
    From Bailey to Williams we are loaded on the line that will make us dangerous

    LB - Hali, Houston, Ford, Alexander, Wilson, Johnson, March, Mauga, Moses, Massaquoi, Nicolas, Smith, Mulumba and Adams.
    Even if Houston has to miss a few games we are set especially with March coming back from injury we can put him and Wilson in their and be just fine

    CB - Peters, Gaines, Nelson, Russell, White, Sorenson, Brown, Carr, Cheek, Fleming, Harris, Jones, and Randolph
    I's so excited about this group this year from Peters to Sorenson so much talent and star power, IF i were you guys i would be excited about Russell, Nelson and White

    Safety - Berry, Parker, Murray, and Cooper
    They have said they like Murray from the 4th round at Safety and Cooper is more natural and has better range at Safety, Parker for obvious reasons and Murray is gonna be a stud

  2. #2
    Member Since
    Dec 2008
    Location
    kcmo
    Posts
    3,683

    Default

    Looks good to me. One spot im worried about is the other cb. I dont trust gaines. He looks stiff when he covers.

  3. #3
    Member Since
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Falls Village, Ct
    Posts
    9,803

    Default

    I think "Depth Everywhere" is Andy Reid's signature. Sorta like "next man up". Perfection? Hell no. But under Reid we seem to be able to survive critical injuries better than most teams.

  4. #4
    Member Since
    May 2016
    Posts
    4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jason1981 View Post
    Looks good to me. One spot im worried about is the other cb. I dont trust gaines. He looks stiff when he covers.
    Man, Gaines is very, very good when healthy. Elite in the slot. If it was me, I'd have Peters at RCB, Gaines at slot, and Russel, White, Nelson, or Cooper (haha, it could happen if he returned to early 2013 form) at LCB. Or, I'd have Gaines start at LCB then slide to slot if needed, and Nelson backup slot.
    The most overrated player on this team is Marcus Peters. He's awesome--and I loved the pick--but I need to see more consistency.

  5. #5
    Member Since
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    1,000

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ctchiefsfan View Post
    I think "Depth Everywhere" is Andy Reid's signature. Sorta like "next man up". Perfection? Hell no. But under Reid we seem to be able to survive critical injuries better than most teams.
    . If we would have had Maclin and Houston healthy for our playoff loss last season we would have won that game for sure. Those 2 critical injuries kicked our ***

  6. #6
    Member Since
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    8,866

    Default

    yeah but to lose by only 7 points to the Pats without Maclin and Houston is really good though

  7. #7
    Member Since
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Falls Village, Ct
    Posts
    9,803

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Justin5772002 View Post
    . If we would have had Maclin and Houston healthy for our playoff loss last season we would have won that game for sure. Those 2 critical injuries kicked our ***
    True, but you must keep in mind that we lost Maclin, Houston, Hali was at best at 50% by the Pats game, and of course JC was out. Last year was a tribute to "Next Man Up". We simply had too many key men down or gimpy to beat the Pats in Foxboro.

    As I said, "Next Man Up" does not yield perfection but under Reid it yields a team that despite numerous key injuries can still can still be competitive with the best in the NFL.

  8. #8
    Member Since
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Falls Village, Ct
    Posts
    9,803

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chiefs4life24 View Post
    yeah but to lose by only 7 points to the Pats without Maclin and Houston is really good though
    Without Houston, Maclin, JC, Mitch Morse, Duvernay-Tardiff, Eric Fisher was dinged up Take a look at the injury report for the game against the Pats... http://www.foxsports.com/nfl/kansas-...es?season=2015 We were LOADED with walking wounded.

  9. #9
    Member Since
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    7,890

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Justin5772002 View Post
    . If we would have had Maclin and Houston healthy for our playoff loss last season we would have won that game for sure. Those 2 critical injuries kicked our ***
    This brings up a really valid point. We managed to put up 20 points against them despite this, Maclin and Houston would've definitely made up for seven points if they'd been 100%. If we'd had JC back at that point, too...(Insert expletives). You don't win playoff games when the team arrives from the back of an ambulance.

    It does make me appreciate how Dorsey has approached draft scenarios where there's no standouts or when we've had our draft picks hand-tied. There's an obvious drop off from the first stringers, so Dorsey focused on the 2nd and 3rd stringers so that the drop off wouldn't be so severe when we had to go to them, not too mention the chance of getting someone who flew under the radar (not easy with all the media attention spent on the draft) and having them be the next breakout star.

  10. #10
    Member Since
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Falls Village, Ct
    Posts
    9,803

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by eydugstr View Post
    this brings up a really valid point. We managed to put up 20 points against them despite this, maclin and houston would've definitely made up for seven points if they'd been 100%. If we'd had jc back at that point, too...(insert expletives). You don't win playoff games when the team arrives from the back of an ambulance.

    It does make me appreciate how dorsey has approached draft scenarios where there's no standouts or when we've had our draft picks hand-tied. There's an obvious drop off from the first stringers, so dorsey focused on the 2nd and 3rd stringers so that the drop off wouldn't be so severe when we had to go to them, not too mention the chance of getting someone who flew under the radar (not easy with all the media attention spent on the draft) and having them be the next breakout star.
    great post!!!!

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Reciever Depth.
    By sling58 in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 09-01-2014, 02:08 PM
  2. Depth Chart
    By GarH in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 08-09-2012, 11:58 PM
  3. this depth chart is not right
    By marloweopatchiefs in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 08-11-2009, 04:45 PM
  4. Depth-chart
    By chief31 in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 08-08-2007, 09:49 PM
  5. so much for depth at right tackle.
    By chief31 in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 06-17-2006, 03:39 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •