Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 35

Thread: Bad and Good?

  1. #1
    Member Since
    Nov 2007
    Location
    KC,MO
    Posts
    61

    Default Bad and Good?

    Although it is disappointing to see the Chiefs lose again, I think the plays were called a little bit differently (quite a few more throws of the ball), I think this was a good move, even though it was a loss. I think it shows that they do have the potential to win some more games...

    Do you Agree? Disagree? Why?

    Priest Holmes= my favorite Chiefs RB.. ever.

  2. #2
    Member Since
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Killer City, KS
    Posts
    1,497

    Angry

    I agree at some point but croyle was not in the game. I cannot stress how many times in the game you would see Huard stay in the pocket, and because of his indecisiveness, allow himself to get sacked. I think it was a good 4-5 times he stood back there for like 5-6 seconds and didn't get rid of the ball. I think that if it were Croyle, the ball would've been out of his hands and into Tony or D-Bo's hands.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  3. #3
    Member Since
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Philly
    Posts
    1,880

    Default

    Now that we're 4-8 and all but eliminated from post season play, I think it would be good if they call for more frequent and aggressive passing plays. And they can still distribute to Kolby Smith a fair amount of times since he produces and to keep the defenses off kilter. Be good to let Croyle and/or Thigpen get experience.

    And since 3 of the 4 teams we have left to play don't have a winning record, I'd say there's potential we can win some games. :) And maybe this pattern gives us some hope for the game next week at Denver:

    Chiefs at San Diego -> WIN
    San Diego at Chiefs -> LOSS
    Chiefs at Oakland -> WIN
    Oakland at Chiefs -> LOSS
    Denver at Chiefs -> LOSS
    Therefore, Chiefs at Denver -> WIN!

    But the real thing that gives us a reasonable shot at Denver is that their defense is horrible. Oakland walked all over them. Denver has the 2nd worst defense in the NFL (but granted, we have the 3rd worst offense!).

  4. #4
    Member Since
    Sep 2005
    Location
    SE Kansas
    Posts
    31,642

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kcchiefsfan View Post
    Although it is disappointing to see the Chiefs lose again, I think the plays were called a little bit differently (quite a few more throws of the ball), I think this was a good move, even though it was a loss. I think it shows that they do have the potential to win some more games...

    Do you Agree? Disagree? Why?

    Yes, because. :p

  5. #5
    Member Since
    Jun 2006
    Location
    betwwen lost and nowhere,southcentral ks.
    Posts
    1,258

    Default

    yes we might beat the jets. the donkies i would have yes except its in donkyland and they were bad the last time and they stomped our butts. theother two games only if the stars line up right.
    i can remember what a chief super bowl team looks like! ......

  6. #6
    Member Since
    Sep 2005
    Location
    SE Kansas
    Posts
    31,642

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wolfpack View Post
    yes we might beat the jets. the donkies i would have yes except its in donkyland and they were bad the last time and they stomped our butts. theother two games only if the stars line up right.
    ...And if the planets are aligned just right in the shadow of a full moon at high tide.

  7. #7
    Member Since
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Illinois... No longer .. Finally back home Blue Springs MO
    Posts
    2,417

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chiefster View Post
    ...And if the planets are aligned just right in the shadow of a full moon at high tide.
    Wouldn't it be easier to just cut the brake lines on Herms car? Or maybe hire a hit on him, LOL just kidding but I do believe it would be a better bet the waiting for the stars and planets to align.




  8. #8
    Member Since
    Aug 2006
    Location
    MO
    Posts
    1,540

    Default

    We have to get a QB. I was a huge Croyle fan, but I think now maybe he was an injury risk. Jesus, let's get some people in here who will help us.
    "If you need braggin' on, let someone else do it"-my dad


  9. #9
    Member Since
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Springfield, MO
    Posts
    2,049

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by prough91 View Post
    We have to get a QB. I was a huge Croyle fan, but I think now maybe he was an injury risk. Jesus, let's get some people in here who will help us.
    I don't think we'd have to worry as much about Croyle if we had a better O-line. I'd love to see what he could do with one. I also think Smith could be even better.
    Everything happens for a reason.

  10. #10
    Member Since
    Sep 2007
    Location
    RIGHT NEXT TO ARROWHEAD!
    Posts
    18,752

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by prough91 View Post
    We have to get a QB. I was a huge Croyle fan, but I think now maybe he was an injury risk. Jesus, let's get some people in here who will help us.
    I think Thigpens arm looked better than Croyles.

    Didn't get to watch him scramble much.

    I will have to do that.

    Not that this is supposed to be an impeach Croyle post, but damn Thigpen looked good.
    http://arrowheadjunkies.com/pictures/PhotoShop/sig_pics/NFL_Players/kansas_city_chiefs/tyson.jackson/062009/tyson.jackson.500.png

Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •