Cover 2

[wolfpack]

i think i figured out why we use it all the time. Law and Surtan are old and slow and already play 10 to 15 yards off the receiver so they are already in part cover 2

[hermhater]

So you agree with Herm?

Use a defensive scheme that your players are not able to actually able to cover?

Put some fast LB's (DJ) into coverage you freakin' moron!!!

[greg3564]

i think i figured out why we use it all the time. Law and Surtan are old and slow and already play 10 to 15 yards off the receiver so they are already in part cover 2

Not only have you figured it out, but 10 other teams this season have too.

[prough91]

I was reading in a magazine to day that next year Herm is going to implement the "Cover none" defense.

[Hayvern]

I was reading in a magazine to day that next year Herm is going to implement the "Cover none" defense.

Could not be any worse..

[hermhater]

I was talking today with some guys at Arrowhead, and we decided to call it the cover zero Defense, since we cover ZERO receivers down the middle of the field!

[stlchief]

What???? We need to cover the middle of the field also?

That's would be a problem....

[chief31]

Actually, seein' as how our CBs are so old, it is probably wise to avoid putting them in man-to-man coverage as much as possible.

Although it clearly hasn't been working out so well lately. I think it may be a bit late to be implementing a defense that seems to be getting solved around the league a bit more.

[Chiefster]

Not only have you figured it out, but 10 other teams this season have too.

Exactly!

[m0ef0e]

I heard that there was an electrical problem with Ty Law's Rascal (or is it a Hoveround?) and that's why the defense has been so pourous lately.