Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 20

Thread: ESPN's 1st and 10

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Member Since
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Scottsdale, Arizona
    Posts
    1,852

    Default ESPN's 1st and 10

    Was watching 1st and 10 this morning and they were talking about the rumored Moss and Culpepper reunion. One of the Two live Stu's bros. suggested that the Chiefs would be a GREAT place for the duo to rekindle their relationship. Wondered what the crowd thought? I personally would do it in a second!!!!!! Moss can only add to our team. ( although I realize the possibility of turmoil in the locker room ) He is still probably the best receiver in the game and to add that type of player to any team would be a good thing. Culpepper has shown some signs of being old and done, not to mention fragile but he can't do any worse that either of the guys we have now. With an improved O line, these two guys would be great additions to this team!!! To bad it will NEVER come to fruition mainly because CP would NEVER spend the money Moss would require. Culpepper would not cost much and I believe he could be a good teacher to a young guy.

  2. #2
    Member Since
    Jun 2005
    Location
    San Antonio, TX
    Posts
    3,846

    Default

    lmao!!! I was only joking before, but from what i can tell, you actually posted this with a straight face.

    ....just another FA junkie.

  3. #3
    Member Since
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Scottsdale, Arizona
    Posts
    1,852

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by texaschief View Post
    lmao!!! I was only joking before, but from what i can tell, you actually posted this with a straight face.

    ....just another FA junkie.
    Me a FA junkie?

    If your suggesting that we don't need help at the WR position, you may need to rethink things! I am not suggesting before O line or even CB but it is a position that needs to be addressed!

  4. #4
    Member Since
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Grain Valley, MO
    Posts
    2,425

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DrunkHillbilly View Post
    Me a FA junkie?

    If your suggesting that we don't need help at the WR position, you may need to rethink things! I am not suggesting before O line or even CB but it is a position that needs to be addressed!
    Agreed. We need help in a lot of places. Moss still has it-- he certainly proved it last year. However, I wouldn't give a used stick of gum for Culpepper.
    Thanks for all the yards, TDs, and memories, Priest!

  5. #5
    Member Since
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Scottsdale, Arizona
    Posts
    1,852

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by m0ef0e View Post
    Agreed. We need help in a lot of places. Moss still has it-- he certainly proved it last year. However, I wouldn't give a used stick of gum for Culpepper.
    I know it would be a bit of a risk but he couldn't possibly be any worse than what we have now! As most know, I have no faith in Croyle. Hopefully he proves me wrong but I think this will be a position we will need to address badly next season!

  6. #6
    Member Since
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Grain Valley, MO
    Posts
    2,425

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DrunkHillbilly View Post
    I know it would be a bit of a risk but he couldn't possibly be any worse than what we have now! As most know, I have no faith in Croyle. Hopefully he proves me wrong but I think this will be a position we will need to address badly next season!
    I agree with you on Croyle. I'm galaxies away from being sold on him. He hasn't been impressive by any stretch of the imagination but that's not to say he can't get better. I hope he does and has a good career for himself.

    However, from what I saw of Culpepper last season was easily just as dismal as anything Croyle or Huard did. In fact, Huard played better, IMO, than Culpepper did last year. So, I would rather just keep Damon around than even think about signing Culpepper. Though, Daunte's not as far gone as Trent Green, they both need to start thinking about the same thing-- retirement!

    I guess what I'm getting around to is that I agree the position will need to be addressed but signing Culpepper will not fix anything and we should just stay away from him unless we want more shoddy and inadequate play from our QB. JMHO

    EDIT: The only thing I think Croyle has over Culpepper, is the fact that he's young.
    Thanks for all the yards, TDs, and memories, Priest!

  7. #7
    Member Since
    Sep 2005
    Location
    SE Kansas
    Posts
    31,642

    Default

    Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  8. #8
    Member Since
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Read the name dumbass!!
    Posts
    13,363

    Default

    Looks like Chiefster pooped himself again! :)
    The only reason a beer sweats around Canada is because he's decided it will be the next beer he drinks.

  9. #9
    Member Since
    Sep 2005
    Location
    SE Kansas
    Posts
    31,642

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Canada View Post
    Looks like Chiefster pooped himself again! :)
    I was protected.

    Thanks...
    Attached Images Attached Images

  10. #10
    Member Since
    May 2006
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    9,152

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by texaschief View Post
    PFT:

    Culpepper would put our organization in an even worse position at QB than it already is. The Chiefs already wasted one year by starting Huard this past season and weren't able to properly evaluate Croyle. If we bring in Culpepper, at the end of next season, we'd still have the same questions about Croyle as we do this season. It's just not a good idea anyway you look at it.
    And thank God for that!!! Noone has ever seen Croyle play with an NFL offense yet, and he is already getting the boot from alot Chiefs fans.

    If he had been starting from the beginning last season, then everyone would want his head on a platter. Because of a piss-poor offensive line.

    On top of that, everyone would currently be screaming for a QB in the first round. Which would awesome. (<<<Sarcasm.) Let's get another body that can be abused by defenses with a sub-par offensive line.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •