Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 28 of 28

Thread: PFT: Draft Needs

  1. #1
    Member Since
    Jun 2005
    Location
    San Antonio, TX
    Posts
    3,846

    Default PFT: Draft Needs

    Here’s a look at the perceived draft needs of the Kansas City Chiefs, with heavy input from Matt Miller and David Gardner of NewEraScouting.com.

    Left Tackle: The Chiefs claimed on waivers free agent Anthony Alabi, cut by the Dolphins, and perhaps he can supplant 2007 free-agent addition Damion McIntosh at left tackle. But is either guy really the right guy to protect the quarterback’s blind side? Solid left tackles never come available on the open market, because their teams will never let them get away.

    Jake Long would be the ideal pick at No. 5 overall, but it’s unlikely that he’ll still be on the board. Ryan Clady of Boise State is a very athletic pass protector and has the talent to become a franchise left tackle, but he may be a reach at No. 5. Should the team wait until round two, they could find Barry Richardson (Clemson) or Jeff Otah (Pitt) waiting to be plucked from the board.

    Quarterback: There are some who believe that Brodie Croyle is the future of this team, but he hasn’t done much in the present to justify it. The Chiefs could opt to go with Matt Ryan at No. 5.

    Then again, some believe that G.M. Carl Peterson likes Louisville quarterback Brian Brohm, whose stock is sliding. Brohm could be on the board when the Chiefs use their second-round selection.

    Wide receiver: Dwayne Bowe looks like a future Pro Bowler. Opposite him, the team could be relying on Devard Darling, a free agent pick up from Baltimore, who never has fulfilled his promise. Jeff Webb has shown ability, but he is not consistent and struggles to separate. Samie Parker, Eddie Drummond, and Bobby Sippio are journeymen at best; Parker and Drummond are free agents and likely won’t return.

    The draft this year is deep at the position, and it would allow them to add more weapons to an offense that has a lot of young pieces in place. Looking at the third round, the Chiefs could find players such as Early Doucet (LSU) and Adrian Arrington (Michigan) on their board. Both are productive receivers who have shown up in big games against top competition.

    Cornerback: Ty Law is long gone, leaving an opening at left cornerback. Patrick Surtain is on his last legs as a starter and there is little talent behind him. Second-stringer from 2007 Benny Sapp recently bolted for Minnesota. Cornerback could be the team’s first pick this year; regardless, it’s a need they’ll definitely address at some point in the draft.

    Players being linked to K.C. are Antoine Cason (Arizona), a talented cover-two style corner, Patrick Lee (Auburn), Aqib Talib (Kansas), and Zack Bowman (Nebraska).

    Center: Casey Weigmann left for Denver, leaving the Chiefs with no clear-cut replacement on hand. With free-agent Justin Hartwig choosing Pittsburgh, the Chiefs could look for a starter in the draft. Adam Spieker from nearby Missouri is a player the team was scouting heavily during the 2007 season. The Chiefs’ zone-blocking scheme also favors mobile centers like Doug Legursky and Mike Pollak.

    Then again, there’s a chance that the Chiefs will go with Rudy Niswanger as the starter.

    Defensive line: Jared Allen will be back, barring a trade of the franchise player. Allen will be joined by second-year players Turk McBride and Tank Tyler at tackle, and Tamba Hali on the other end. There’s a lot of talent in this group, but not much depth. McBride has also bounced between end and tackle. Ron Edwards and Alfonso Boone offer some, but are not stars.

    Tight end: Kris Wilson has bolted, leaving no experience behind 32-year-old Pro Bowler Tony Gonzalez. Gonzalez has been healthy throughout his career, but the team relies heavily on him in the red zone. Lining up a potential replacement will help the team immensely down the road.
    *********************
    Thought y'all might like to read it.

  2. #21
    Member Since
    Sep 2005
    Location
    SE Kansas
    Posts
    31,643

    Default

    It is all conjecture at this point, however, I fully expect Carl to once again ignore the glaring team needs.

  3. #22
    Member Since
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    22,845

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by texaschief View Post
    Are you serious? You think out of that list you posted, that the only starting left tackles will be Long and Clady out of that whole bunch? Otah, Williams, Cherilus and Baker will almost assuredly be starting left tackles. Also, Collins, Hills and Clark all have the size, but they would probably starters after a year or two with some good experience.
    I am not opposed to the Chiefs taking more than one tackle in this year's draft.

    Quote Originally Posted by texaschief View Post
    One of the biggest reasons why i don't think we'll be taking an OT with our first pick is because the more "athletic" OTs will be taken later. Clady is a better athlete than Long. Long is a mauler and will be a much better pass protector than run blocker. With the running offense Herm likes, they will probably look to find the best athlete in the OT class.

    I think you'll see Clady, Williams, Cherilus, and Baker at the top of that list.
    If J Long is gone, I wouldn't be surprised to see the Chiefs take a CB with the 1st pick. Then try and get an Otah or Baker in the 2nd rd.

    Quote Originally Posted by Chiefster View Post
    It is all conjecture at this point, however, I fully expect Carl to once again ignore the glaring team needs.
    Way to think positive!


  4. #23
    Member Since
    May 2006
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    9,152

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rbedgood View Post
    There's a difference between a "starting left tackle" and a "stud at left tackle". Long and Clady will likely both be studs...the other guys will be starters but not necessarily studs.

    I can't pretend to read TexasChiefs' mind, but I'd guess he hasn't mentioned some of these other guys because they aren't as exciting of a prospect as the top 2. I really like Baker and Otah especially. I think both should be late 1st round to early 2nd round picks and will likely start for almost any team if not as rookies then within a year or so. However they don't project to dominate the way Long or Clady should.
    I believe that Otah will go at no.12, to the Panthers, unless we decide to allow them to take Clady in his place.

    But as far as athleticism goes, it's biggest advantage to offensive linemen comes in pass-protection. Especially in Herms ultra-generic running game. Herm doesn't usually show any form of creativity in running the ball.

    Also, Long is the best athelete at his position, in this draft class. In my, and most others' opinions.

  5. #24
    Member Since
    Jun 2007
    Location
    ID
    Posts
    262

    Default

    [quote=Coach;78573]I am not opposed to the Chiefs taking more than one tackle in this year's draft.


    If J Long is gone, I wouldn't be surprised to see the Chiefs take a CB with the 1st pick. Then try and get an Otah or Baker in the 2nd rd.


    If Long is not available in the 1st, taking a CB would not be a bad idea, then pick up an OT in the 2nd.
    Keeping my britches between the ditches! :character00182:

  6. #25
    Member Since
    Sep 2007
    Location
    RIGHT NEXT TO ARROWHEAD!
    Posts
    18,752

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chief31 View Post
    I believe that Otah will go at no.12, to the Panthers, unless we decide to allow them to take Clady in his place.

    But as far as athleticism goes, it's biggest advantage to offensive linemen comes in pass-protection. Especially in Herms ultra-generic running game. Herm doesn't usually show any form of creativity in running the ball.

    Also, Long is the best athelete at his position, in this draft class. In my, and most others' opinions.
    I hope we don't let him get away.

    Get some linemen Herm!

    http://arrowheadjunkies.com/pictures/PhotoShop/sig_pics/NFL_Players/kansas_city_chiefs/tyson.jackson/062009/tyson.jackson.500.png

  7. #26
    Member Since
    Jun 2005
    Location
    San Antonio, TX
    Posts
    3,846

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chief31 View Post
    I believe that Otah will go at no.12, to the Panthers, unless we decide to allow them to take Clady in his place.

    But as far as athleticism goes, it's biggest advantage to offensive linemen comes in pass-protection. Especially in Herms ultra-generic running game. Herm doesn't usually show any form of creativity in running the ball.

    Also, Long is the best athelete at his position, in this draft class. In my, and most others' opinions.
    Actually, he's probably the most complete in this draft. Not necessarily the best athlete.

  8. #27
    Member Since
    May 2006
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    9,152

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chief31 View Post
    Long is the best athelete at his position, in this draft class. In my, and most others' opinions.
    Quote Originally Posted by texaschief View Post
    Actually, he's probably the most complete in this draft. Not necessarily the best athlete.
    I stand by my statement.

  9. #28
    Member Since
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    4,843

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by texaschief View Post
    Actually, he's probably the most complete in this draft. Not necessarily the best athlete.
    He is not the most nimble...I agree with that...however as for athleticism, strength is a factor. Therefore I'm with Chief31 on this one, he is the most complete athlete. The other guys who are more nimble than him, don't approach his raw strength and/or technique.
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    The 49ers own my heart, but the Chiefs will always hold a better than neutral spot for giving my favorite player a place to leave with grace...

    Resident Comedian/Statistician/Researcher/Diplomat

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •