Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 46

Thread: Chiefs finally part ways with Greg Wesley

  1. #1
    Member Since
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Kansas City
    Posts
    7,491

    Default Chiefs finally part ways with Greg Wesley

    The Chiefs finally let Greg Wesley go yesterday. I am not upset he is gone by any means, but I disgusted with how the Chiefs handled this. They pretty much screwed Wesley in the worste way by sitting butt on the bench for two years and then finally releasing him a week before camp starts. Preventing him from signing on to a team with a decent contract. His demand will be extremely low right now.

  2. #31
    Member Since
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Scottsdale, Arizona
    Posts
    1,852

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grbac View Post
    How the F we gonna let Greg Wesley go!!?!!!He was dope as hell with KC.:mad:
    You obviously need to brush up on your Chief news!!! The Chiefs have been trying to trade Wesley for over a year! He almost went to Denver but that fell through last year. He has been telling the Chiefs he wanted out ever since he found out they were trying to trade him!!!

  3. #32
    Member Since
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    164

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by milkman View Post
    I am utterly awestruck by the lack of your football knowledge.

    Someone who has never watched a game of football would be more insightful.


    What does a lack of football knowledge have to do with my comment mentioning Greg was dope as hell with KC?
    Last edited by Dyno-Mite; 07-20-2008 at 05:18 PM. Reason: Punctuation

  4. #33
    Member Since
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Left coast
    Posts
    336

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grbac View Post
    What does a lack of football knowledge have to do with my comment mentioning Greg was dope as hell with KC?
    Unless I'm mistaken "dope as hell" means very good, or better.

    Anyone who thinks that Wesley was very good is clearly not on the same continent as a clue.
    ...

  5. #34
    Member Since
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    164

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by milkman View Post
    Unless I'm mistaken "dope as hell" means very good, or better.

    Anyone who thinks that Wesley was very good is clearly not on the same continent as a clue.



    Dope as hell can just mean good.It doesn't have to mean "very" good.Greg was good with KC.Please STFU.You're not making any sense.

  6. #35
    Member Since
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Hartford, South Dakota
    Posts
    1,409

    Default

    This reminds me a middle school on the playground ! Im taking my ball and going home !

  7. #36
    Member Since
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Left coast
    Posts
    336

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grbac View Post
    Dope as hell can just mean good.It doesn't have to mean "very" good.Greg was good with KC.Please STFU.You're not making any sense.
    I'm not up on street slang, but I would think simply "dope" is good, while "dope as hell" would be very good.

    Regardless, he was neither very good, or simply just good.

    He was consistently out of position, consistently bit on the play action, opening the deep middle, and consistently whiffed on tackles.

    The occassional hard hit doesn't make up for consistently poor play.

    The only reason you can't make any sense out of my posts is that I actually have a real vocabulary, and know a little about the game of football.
    ...

  8. #37
    Member Since
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Scottsdale, Arizona
    Posts
    1,852

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grbac View Post
    Dope as hell can just mean good.It doesn't have to mean "very" good.Greg was good with KC.Please STFU.You're not making any sense.
    He was never "dope as hell"! He was ok but if I have to see him get burned deep one more time I may puke!! Not to mention the off the field crap! We have our two safeties set and he doesn't fit in the mix!

  9. #38
    Member Since
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    2,246

    Default

    Oh man, Grbac does it again, thanks for the laugh!
    C:\Users\Master Sin\Desktop\thumb_pl_180492.jpg

  10. #39
    Member Since
    Feb 2007
    Location
    ALASKA
    Posts
    3,080

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RaidersOwnYou View Post
    Lmao!!!

    Way to go chiefs, you just let go your best safety!!

    Jamarcus russell should have no problem throwing the ball on the ty law-less chiefs.

    worst secondary in the afc west for sure.
    Best Safety? J.Russel? worst secondary in the AFC? the answer is no to all of these is no. Wesley was ok

    but Pollard (and don't pretend you don't who Jarrad Page is....you know, two game clinching

    interceptions..against the Faders?) is better. J Russell can throw a "ton" especially if he puts

    his weight into it! Just because he's high paid does not make him well played. he has yet to prove

    himself also. as for the worst secondary in the AFC west: and these rankings are AFC only- against

    the pass....#4 K.C. @ 188 yds./gm( the lower the number, the better-for you fader fans who might

    not understand)#6 Donks @ 193 yds./gm #7 Faders @ 195 yds./gm #10 Dolts @ 213 yds./gm so one could

    argue that the reason for this is because the other team ran on you, yes a good argument. So

    against the run, and again ranked in AFC only #7 Dolts @ 107 yds./gm #12 K.C. @ 130 yds./gm #14

    Donks @ 142 yds./gm and last and least #15 Faders @ 145 yds./gm Please do not come on here to spout a bunch of BS! I can and will talk to fader fans( my brother is one but I still love and forgive him) as long as they at least act a "little" intelligent.


  11. #40
    Member Since
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Scottsdale, Arizona
    Posts
    1,852

    Default

    Greg Wesley just signed with the RAIDERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •