Originally Posted by Sn@keIze
I would would take a lot more pride in losing 17-10 if they had Brady.
We dont need (or other teams) Brady to be hurt to win.
We forced two turnovers and Pats were scoreless while they had Brady. (Granted didnt play a whole quarter).
But still, I like to think we would have put up a good fight (or even won) if they had Brady in there the whole game.
The fact that there are people out there happy to see Brady get hurt proves just how good he is.
It's actually a bummer-he is fun to watch and good for the game