Rep

[tornadospotter]

Change the rep system back to what we last had it at! I am tired of seeing spammers with 58's! 58's should be earned!!!!

[jtandcrew]

well for 1 i dont know how to give someone any rep points or whatever! 2nd? I dont really care about the rep! Just care about the cash!

[Chiefster]

Give them a neggie.

Are we certain that somebody is actually positive repping a spammer? I know most of us could severely damage them with just one neg rep.

Agreed!

Another solution might be that it take at least 50 or even 100 posts to send or recieve rep. Is it possible to turn rep off for individual users until a set post quota is met?

[Chiefster]

Can't do it! I am too cool!!

Well you are from Canada.

[tornadospotter]

well for 1 i dont know how to give someone any rep points or whatever! 2nd? I dont really care about the rep! Just care about the cash!

Well #1 to give rep you click on the scales in the gray box, #2 you earn arrowcash by posting, when have enought you can place bets to earn, or lose, You can also play in the casino, but by far the easiest way to get arrowcash is to go to the texas holdup and play against me, I suck at that game!

[jtandcrew]

Well #1 to give rep you click on the scales in the gray box, #2 you earn arrowcash by posting, when have enought you can place bets to earn, or lose, You can also play in the casino, but by far the easiest way to get arrowcash is to go to the texas holdup and play against me, I suck at that game!

yeah, ive been playing the casino. Name when and time and iill try to join

[tornadospotter]

Agreed!

Another solution might be that it take at least 50 or even 100 posts to send or recieve rep. Is it possible to turn rep off for individual users until a set post quota is met?

I think that you should have a number of post to start getting rep, but maybe 25 posts, just so spammers or trowelers can get rep, for what? I think there is a number of us that can identify spammers and call for mod's to ban, and we can neg rep them also.

[Chiefster]

I think that you should have a number of post to start getting rep, but maybe 25 posts, just so spammers or trowelers can get rep, for what? I think there is a number of us that can identify spammers and call for mod's to ban, and we can neg rep them also.

Isn't it fun???

[tornadospotter]

Isn't it fun???

well yes that is fun, but I can not neg rep them all by my self!

[rbedgood]

Instead of a complete reset, what about a scaled reset. Maybe something like everyone keeps 1% of their current rep total. Thus allowing those with large amounts to stay up front a bit, but lowering the value to what they were about a year ago.

[Chiefster]

Instead of a complete reset, what about a scaled reset. Maybe something like everyone keeps 1% of their current rep total. Thus allowing those with large amounts to stay up front a bit, but lowering the value to what they were about a year ago.

There is always going to be an issue with rep from someone's perspective, however, I think what's been suggested here has merit.

There is a standard used by another popular Chiefs board where you give 1 point of rep for each 100 days you've been a member, you give 1 point of rep for each 1000 posts you have and you give 1 point of rep for each 100 points of rep you have.