Which would you prefer until Croyle comes back? Whatever the case, argue about it here. As for me, I could care less, whichever one gets us a win is fine with me.
Which would you prefer until Croyle comes back? Whatever the case, argue about it here. As for me, I could care less, whichever one gets us a win is fine with me.
Yeah, that's exactly my point. Our only chance of a QB that could do anything with this mess is a guy that can run away from blitzes and still fire it down the field with extreme accuracy. Thigpen is capable, but he forces it way too much. Huard can hit open receivers much easier, but can't by enough time to do that. Lose/lose situation.
This team isn't going to make the playoffs. So let's assess talent. Play the kid.
I can't wait to get our starting qb back - who has yet to win an nfl game. Come on. This situation is absurd.
SHUT IT
I agree. We are in a rebuilding process so why not keep playing him to see what we have in him? 1 game and then pull him? Thats BS! BTW Huard wont retire, after his contract is up here or he gets released ( which he will if he has more than 1 year left) He will go to another team and have a chance to start or atleast be the backup
Thats what I was thinking. But, to contribute to the thread. Keep Thigpen in, either he is burned at the stake or he thrives. This was his first NFL start, very few QBs have a good game thier first start.
Although from what I saw, we got a loooooong year ahead with Thigpen under center.
Bookmarks