Carl Vs. L.j. Is Next Battle Royale

[Chiefster]

I have to admit had me laughing on this one.

CARL VS. L.J. IS NEXT BATTLE ROYALE
With Jared Allen eating sushi and promising to lead a wil’-out-free social life, and Trent Green packing his footballs and heading to a South Florida home, there’s only one compelling story line left in the latest episode of “The Last King of Mediocrity.”

Carl Peterson vs. Larry Johnson.

Yes, the main event: King Carl vs. L.J. for all the money in Clark Hunt’s piggybank. This should be far better than De la Hoya-Mayweather, and if the executives running HBO were smart, they’d do a 24/7 documentary on this historic battle rather than taping Kansas City’s training camp.

This is a showdown that has been brewing ever since King Carl hoodwinked Johnson and his agent into signing that ridiculous, Master P-approved rookie contract. This thing should get UFC bloody and ugly.

Before the end of training camp, I fully expect Peterson’s pit bull/mouthpiece Bob Gretz and Johnson’s pit bull/mouthpiece Rhonda Moss to square off in a dogfight that will have Michael “Ron Cujo” Vick flush with envy.

Seriously, I’m so glad Trent Green is finally gone. Bickering over the value and treatment of a filthy-rich, 37-year-old quarterback was a bit boring for my taste, especially when you know Peterson could just as easily botch a fourth-round pick as a sixth.

The Green-Peterson scrap sounded like a Leawood father and son arguing over whether the kid deserves the fully loaded SUV or the sport package. Peterson-Johnson has the promise of getting as rowdy as me and my brother coming to blows over the last pork chop at a Labor Day barbecue.

Right now, my money is on The Last King of Mediocrity.

He’s been in the gym training for this bout ever since Priest Holmes bamboozled the Chiefs out of a final payday and quickly retired to a life of nachos, yearly, inconclusive MRI scans on his spine and baby’s mama drama.

King Carl vowed never again. Only Tony Gonzalez and Tom Condon are allowed to fleece the Hunt’s bank account under Peterson’s watch. Peterson would rather name Ethan Locke head coach and put Jack Harry in charge of ticket prices than reward Larry Johnson with LaDainian Tomlinson-type money.

And, in many respects, Peterson is holding all of the leverage. Peterson gleefully watched as his new head coach, Herm Edwards, overworked Johnson all last season, giving him an NFL record number of carries. Edwards used Johnson in a way that indicated the Chiefs don’t have long-term plans for Johnson.

Peterson could refuse to offer Johnson a fair contract extension, run L.J. into the ground again this season, slap the franchise tag on him for the 2008 season and discard Johnson in 2009.

That would be the cold-blooded business move. Based on the way Johnson has conducted himself in his years as a Chief, I’m not sure many fans would be sympathetic toward Johnson. He has never pretended to be much of a team guy, so few people will care if the Chiefs treat Johnson in a selfish manner.

Johnson’s leverage is a 2007 holdout. He’s on the books to earn about $1.7 million this year. If he sits out and sacrifices the money, the Chiefs could be the 2006 Oakland Raiders. Those Raiders, despite a very good defense, finished 2-14 and scored just 168 points. They were darn near impossible to watch.

The Chiefs could be that bad. Without Johnson, I honestly don’t know how the Chiefs score a point. By midseason, Arrowhead Stadium would be half empty on game day. By the end of the season, you’d swear the Royals were playing football.

And L.J.’s absence would certainly hamper the development of Brodie Croyle.

The problem for Johnson is that The Last King of Mediocrity could survive a 2-14 season. With Green in Miami and the Chiefs breaking in a new quarterback, Peterson could use 2-14 as a true rebuilding year, and Chiefs fans would be excited about having the No. 1 pick (although the enthusiasm would be tempered by the knowledge that Peterson would draft Todd Blackledge).

Again, Peterson is bunkered in and ready for a losing season. Johnson is not prepared to sacrifice $1.7 million. That’s money he’ll never get back. Plus, he’ll be a year older and still looking for a new contract.

Peterson is a heavy favorite in this fight, but we’ve seen him blow 13-3 regular seasons and home-field advantage, so anything is a possibility.

[Chiefster]

Not upset at anyone here.

Upset with the organization!

Ahhh; you truly are a Chiefs fan. LOL!

[Chiefster]

A good "O" line and a solid receiving core along with a QB that can lead all compliment one another. The fact that Arizona had 2 1000+ receivers and a poor "O" line did not change where they ended up last year. A football team is a sum of their parts, and the objective is not to gather stats to be quoted in an attempt to prove a point but to win enough games to get you to the SB and then win just one more. JMHO :)

[DrunkHillbilly]

A good "O" line and a solid receiving core along with a QB that can lead all compliment one another. The fact that Arizona had 2 1000+ receivers and a poor "O" line did not change where they ended up last year. A football team is a sum of their parts, and the objective is not to gather stats to be quoted in an attempt to prove a point but to win enough games to get you to the SB and then win just one more. JMHO :)

Uhhhhhh, not sure what this means but I'm sure we are all in agreeance with your statement.

Further more, lets get one thing straight here, the Cheifs had a FAAAAAR better team than the Cardinals. The reason the Cardinals ended up where they did last years is because.....THEY END UP THERE EVERY YEAR!!!!!!

The whole point of this particular conversation is that it is possible to have a good receiving game with less than a perfect O line when you have more than 1 receiver to handle the duties. You can say all you want to about prevent D and giving you the underneath stuff but with out more than 1 compitant receiver, you don't even give yourself a chance to have success! I think the Chiefs proved that last season.

This is why I have been so hell bent on wanting the Chiefs to pick up a receiver in free agency for so long. Last year was about as bad as the O line has been in quite a few years and we still managed to have a better than average running game. With a couple of receivers to compliment the old man out there on an island by himself, we could have a better team and a better chance to have a better season therefore going futher in the playoffs.

Oh yea, and this is a fan site, not a football team, so the objective is to gather stats and quote them in an attempt to prove a point to people who disagree with what yours, mine or anybody elses point is.

[chief31]

Uhhhhhh, not sure what this means but I'm sure we are all in agreeance with your statement.

Further more, lets get one thing straight here, the Cheifs had a FAAAAAR better team than the Cardinals. The reason the Cardinals ended up where they did last years is because.....THEY END UP THERE EVERY YEAR!!!!!!

The whole point of this particular conversation is that it is possible to have a good receiving game with less than a perfect O line when you have more than 1 receiver to handle the duties. You can say all you want to about prevent D and giving you the underneath stuff but with out more than 1 compitant receiver, you don't even give yourself a chance to have success! I think the Chiefs proved that last season.

This is why I have been so hell bent on wanting the Chiefs to pick up a receiver in free agency for so long. Last year was about as bad as the O line has been in quite a few years and we still managed to have a better than average running game. With a couple of receivers to compliment the old man out there on an island by himself, we could have a better team and a better chance to have a better season therefore going futher in the playoffs.

Oh yea, and this is a fan site, not a football team, so the objective is to gather stats and quote them in an attempt to prove a point to people who disagree with what yours, mine or anybody elses point is.

Well, it sounds like you value the wide reciever position, above all others. So then, Arozona should be the tops, in the league. Maybe Detroit? How about last years Raiders? New York Giants? Redskins? Bengals? Rams? Panthers? Dolphins? Each of those teams has high-caliber reciever talent and each of them, sat at home, for the playoffs.

While the Chiefs, Ravens, Chargers, Bears and Patriots managed more success, without having a top-flight pair of recievers.

[DrunkHillbilly]

Well, it sounds like you value the wide reciever position, above all others. So then, Arozona should be the tops, in the league. Maybe Detroit? How about last years Raiders? New York Giants? Redskins? Bengals? Rams? Panthers? Dolphins? Each of those teams has high-caliber reciever talent and each of them, sat at home, for the playoffs.

While the Chiefs, Ravens, Chargers, Bears and Patriots managed more success, without having a top-flight pair of recievers.

Be realistic here bud! I'm trying to say that with the talent the Chiefs have at other positions, including O line,(hence the Cardinals) with a little help at the receiver position would have and will give them a better chance at winning more games. And by the way, the teams you mentioned that supposedly had no WR's, they all had better # 2's and 3's than Dante Hall and Sammie Parker!!

[chief31]

Be realistic here bud! I'm trying to say that with the talent the Chiefs have at other positions, including O line,(hence the Cardinals) with a little help at the receiver position would have and will give them a better chance at winning more games. And by the way, the teams you mentioned that supposedly had no WR's, they all had better # 2's and 3's than Dante Hall and Sammie Parker!!

Well, of corse upgrading talent, at that position would help. As it would, at any position. It's your exaggerations that compelled me to point-out what you were saying.

[DrunkHillbilly]

Well, of corse upgrading talent, at that position would help. As it would, at any position. It's your exaggerations that compelled me to point-out what you were saying.

What exaggerations?

[chief31]

with out more than 1 compitant receiver, you don't even give yourself a chance to have success!

What exaggerations?

This is the one, in particular, that I was responding to.

[DrunkHillbilly]

You think this is an exaggeration?????? I guess you had more faith in Hall and Parker than I!

[Chiefster]

Well, it sounds like you value the wide reciever position, above all others. So then, Arozona should be the tops, in the league. Maybe Detroit? How about last years Raiders? New York Giants? Redskins? Bengals? Rams? Panthers? Dolphins? Each of those teams has high-caliber reciever talent and each of them, sat at home, for the playoffs.

While the Chiefs, Ravens, Chargers, Bears and Patriots managed more success, without having a top-flight pair of recievers.

Yup!

I feel like the "taste great - less filling" guy.