Page 1 of 7 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 67

Thread: Chiefs should pick #3

  1. #1
    Member Since
    Jun 2005
    Location
    San Antonio, TX
    Posts
    3,846

    Default Chiefs should pick #3

    rams opponents won 136 games.
    chiefs opponents won 137 games.

    The Rams will have the weaker strength of schedule which puts them one pick ahead of us. So, unless I calculated wrong, we should be picking #3.

  2. #2
    Member Since
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Drunken State
    Posts
    4,842

    Default

    Orapko from texas.
    SHUT IT

  3. #3
    Member Since
    Jun 2005
    Location
    San Antonio, TX
    Posts
    3,846

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bike View Post
    Orapko from texas.
    Only if we can trade down. Orakpo isn't a top 3 talent IMO and I'm one of the biggest Texas fans around.

  4. #4
    Member Since
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Drunken State
    Posts
    4,842

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by texaschief View Post
    Only if we can trade down. Orakpo isn't a top 3 talent IMO and I'm one of the biggest Texas fans around.
    Then who do we grab? OL with 1st pick? Or Crabtree if he's there?
    SHUT IT

  5. #5
    Member Since
    Jun 2005
    Location
    San Antonio, TX
    Posts
    3,846

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bike View Post
    Then who do we grab? OL with 1st pick? Or Crabtree if he's there?
    Honestly, I think it'll come down to a can't miss LT or Aaron Curry depending on how the combine goes. I just can't see this team taking that huge risk that comes with drafting a QB with a pick that early.

  6. #6
    Member Since
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Drunken State
    Posts
    4,842

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by texaschief View Post
    Honestly, I think it'll come down to a can't miss LT or Aaron Curry depending on how the combine goes. I just can't see this team taking that huge risk that comes with drafting a QB with a pick that early.
    Depends on new gm. Maybe he'll go for Stafford or Wells and build lines thru fa and later in draft. Either way, its gonna be an interesting off-season...
    SHUT IT

  7. #7
    Member Since
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Nebraska
    Posts
    7,498

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bike View Post
    Depends on new gm. Maybe he'll go for Stafford or Wells and build lines thru fa and later in draft. Either way, its gonna be an interesting off-season...
    :iagree:

  8. #8
    Member Since
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    22,845

    Default

    Trade down is the best case scenario for the Chiefs. If not, I think the Chiefs will address their pass rush problems with the 3rd pick in the draft. They will be skewered by the media if they do something else.


  9. #9
    Member Since
    Jun 2005
    Location
    San Antonio, TX
    Posts
    3,846

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bike View Post
    Depends on new gm. Maybe he'll go for Stafford or Wells and build lines thru fa and later in draft. Either way, its gonna be an interesting off-season...
    These would be disastrous picks for the Chiefs. I'd rather give Charles the chance to be the featured back if we can do something with LJ. He has the frame to be a featured back. Just because he's fast, doesn't mean he's too small. He's a bigger RB than a bunch of featured backs in the game right now. Stafford would be an awful pick. He'd be a younger Huard; immobile and poor decision making under pressure. Behind our line, that would be a recipe for disaster.

  10. #10
    Member Since
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Drunken State
    Posts
    4,842

    Default

    Ok. Then sounds like ol for 1st pick. I don't have problem with that. I'm saying that because I don't think we will be able to trade down to p/u a lb worthy of 3rd pick...
    SHUT IT

Page 1 of 7 12345 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •