JOHNSON OR ALLEN ? One willbe gone.

[wolfpack]

the Glasses,i mean Hunts wont shell out huge bunuses to both,maybe not even to one. which would you keep if you could? i could see allen getting tagged this year and if LJ wont come down some he`ll be traded.

[Sweets]

Is the Chiefs organization even talking with LJ and his agent?

[Chiefster]

the Glasses,i mean Hunts wont shell out huge bunuses to both,maybe not even to one. which would you keep if you could? i could see allen getting tagged this year and if LJ wont come down some he`ll be traded.

I don't see Allen getting tagged, and I stiil believe that Carl will get a deal done with LJ

Is the Chiefs organization even talking with LJ and his agent?

Well things happening around the league leads me to believe that there is at least an open dialog. The Plowgirls are no longer interested in LJ.

[chief31]

I would rather keep Jared Allen. He is an impact player, who, I feel is incredibly under-rated. And, as I've stated before, I think we should "sell-high", in the L.J. matter.

[DrunkHillbilly]

I would rather keep Jared Allen. He is an impact player, who, I feel is incredibly under-rated. And, as I've stated before, I think we should "sell-high", in the L.J. matter.

WOW!!!

[Canada]

I would rather keep Jared Allen. He is an impact player, who, I feel is incredibly under-rated. And, as I've stated before, I think we should "sell-high", in the L.J. matter.

If we have to trade one I agree just for the amount we would get for him,

[Chiefster]

If we have to trade one I agree just for the amount we would get for him,

Or at least the amount we should get for him; remember we're talking about Carl here.

[Guru]

Or at least the amount we should get for him; remember we're talking about Damnit Carl here.

Fixed your post

[Chiefster]

Fixed your post

LOL!!!

Why yes; yes you did.

[wolfpack]

queen carl said once he`d tag allen.rather it was just ramblings or the truth.