Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: USA Today - Inside Slant (Faders)

  1. #1
    Member Since
    Sep 2005
    Location
    SE Kansas
    Posts
    31,643

    Default USA Today - Inside Slant (Faders)

    With negotiations usually flying well under the radar of both the local and national media, the Raiders manage virtually every year to come into training camp with all their picks ready to play.
    The first-round holdouts which happen elsewhere, simply don't happen in Oakland, and the silence surrounding No. 1 overall pick JaMarcus Russell is no different than negotiations that went on between high picks such as Darrell Russell (No. 2 overall in 1997), Charles Woodson (No. 4 overall in 1998) and Robert Gallery (No. 2 overall in 2004).
    The last Raiders first-round pick to hold out more than a couple of days was linebacker Rob Fredrickson in 1994.
    While no one in the organization would admit or even consider the notion, it could prove beneficial for the Raiders if Russell is the first holdout since Fredrickson.
    If Russell were to be a late arrival, it gives the Raiders a built-in reason to stick with what most believe is a commitment to free agent Josh McCown to begin the season as the starter.
    McCown's ability to move set him apart from Russell and Andrew Walter in minicamps and OTAs. (Walter later had arthroscopic knee surgery and is expected to be ready for the start of training camp.)
    He is also considerably more experienced and game-ready. McCown fully understands Russell is the Raiders' future, but in the final year of a two-year contract, he can get his resume' ready as an Oakland starter this season.
    For the sake of Kiffin, McCown, and even Russell, the Raiders might be better off having the quarterback position settled in public early in training camp — and the best way for that to happen is for Russell to come in a little late...

    http://www.usatoday.com/sports/footb...iders/home.htm

  2. #2
    Member Since
    May 2006
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    9,152

    Default

    They have to be better than they were, last year. I think they were better than their record.

  3. #3
    Member Since
    Sep 2005
    Location
    SE Kansas
    Posts
    31,643

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chief31 View Post
    They have to be better than they were, last year. I think they were better than their record.
    Well they always seem to give us all we want in a game; not that it is saying all that much.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •