Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 14 of 14

Thread: Chan is our man - bodes well for Thigpen, Offense...

  1. #1
    Member Since
    Feb 2009
    Location
    California
    Posts
    45

    Thumbs up Chan is our man - bodes well for Thigpen, Offense...

    I'm actually happy that Hal-oli retained Chan Gailey.

    I give Gailey credit for recognizing that the power running game with Larry Johnson (who I hate w/ a passion as a role model but that's another post) was not going to work and for mixing it up w/ the spread. Who knows what would have happened had we gone into training camp with the spread in mind.

    I also think that Haley's move to keep Gailey bodes well for the offense being run through Thigpen. If Haley can stoke the desire to win that we saw in Warner last season and Gailey calls the plays w/o ultra-conservative and often boneheaded Herm (who I love as a role model btw) in his way, I think we have reason to be excited on offense in KC.

    I think we need a new RB tho.

  2. #11
    Member Since
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    7

    Default

    i agree GO CHAN UR THE MAN
    At least where not the the lions

  3. #12
    Member Since
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Salina, KS
    Posts
    360

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JDKCfan View Post
    I think thigpen did a great job last year it would be wrong to not give him a shot with a whole training camp under his belt as a starter.

    I agree. Chan did a great job making the offense fit to Tyler's skills and Tyler deserves the shot at the QB1, even if we draft a QB. Tyler really has not got very much experience on the football field, did not play much in high school or college. He does have room for improvement and keeping Chan Gailey as the OC will only help that development.
    http://www.chiefscrowd.com/forums/image.php?u=2574&type=sigpic&dateline=1233413652

  4. #13
    Member Since
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Central Kansas
    Posts
    34

    Default

    To be honest I'd much rather stay in this spread. I know many cry it isn't a NFL offense, but more teams are going to some form of a spread in the NFL every year. Look at the Patriots, the Cowboys, the Colts, etc. They all basically run the spread now. You can still run the ball effectively in the spread.

  5. #14
    Member Since
    Feb 2009
    Location
    California
    Posts
    45

    Default

    I like the spread too...It keeps defenses off balance and is fun to watch. The Patriots were winning super bowls with the spread - it's not necessarily just a gimmick. I did notice however that we were unable to close out games last year in the spread with no running game. That's something that we'd need to work on. That's why I think a stout OL could really help us. If we could have run spread and then bowl them over in the 2H with the running game, we could have won an additional 4-5 games last year.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. So what does this mean for Chan Gailey?
    By jap1 in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 02-08-2009, 11:33 PM
  2. Chiefs will retain Chan Gailey
    By Seek in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 01-24-2009, 02:12 PM
  3. Thank Chan, not Thig
    By jerhart in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 11-23-2008, 12:06 PM
  4. Chan Ball
    By tornadospotter in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-09-2008, 08:03 PM
  5. Thigpen hurt,herminator the offense terminators luck on QB`S.
    By wolfpack in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-06-2007, 10:23 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •