Page 1 of 16 1234511 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 181

Thread: Latest Mock has Chiefs taking Orakpo

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Member Since
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Kansas City Missouri
    Posts
    3,814

    Default New Mock is out, Curry is still possible IMO

    NFL mock draft: Version V - NFL - Yahoo! Sports

    I really think that Curry will be available by the 3rd pick.

    DET: Has Culpepper, but he is aging. He is also a vet. This would be the perfect opportunity to draft a QB and stick him behind Culpepper to develop.

    STL: Bulger really needs more protection, atleast from what I see. They could use help on D, but I think they should be fine, I would expect them to draft a lineman.

    KC: Curry! But wait a min. Some people speculate that he will be gone. If he is there do we take him? We need an OL to protect Cassel. At the same time, do you let a playmaker like crabtree get away? Cassel's sucess was based on players like Moss and Welker and the whole reciving core. Wait, they used the RB's to.

    I still stick with Curry. The say defense wins its all, and I am begging to think its true. Plus the weak point of KC is the D.

    Guess we will find out April 24th.
    <a href=http://www.chiefscrowd.com/forums/../../../../image.php?type=sigpic&userid=2553&dateline=1258934108 target=_blank>http://www.chiefscrowd.com/forums/.....ine=1258934108</a>

  2. #2
    Member Since
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Drunken State
    Posts
    4,842

    Default

    I don't see how St. Louis can look past Curry. I don't see how anybody could. He is the best football player in the draft.
    SHUT IT

  3. #3
    Member Since
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Kansas City Missouri
    Posts
    3,814

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bike View Post
    I don't see how St. Louis can look past Curry. I don't see how anybody could. He is the best football player in the draft.
    Its not about the best player, its about the right player
    <a href=http://www.chiefscrowd.com/forums/../../../../image.php?type=sigpic&userid=2553&dateline=1258934108 target=_blank>http://www.chiefscrowd.com/forums/.....ine=1258934108</a>

  4. #4
    Member Since
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Drunken State
    Posts
    4,842

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by honda522 View Post
    Its not about the best player, its about the right player
    Thats too much psychobabble for me!!!
    If Currys' there, take him. But by all rights he should be gone 1st or 2nd...
    SHUT IT

  5. #5
    Member Since
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    210

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by honda522 View Post
    Its not about the best player, its about the right player
    Ok Mr. Pioli. Its true but at the same time its not. At this high in the draft you get the best player available.

  6. #6
    Member Since
    May 2006
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    9,152

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fairladyZ View Post
    Only problem is there just isn't a D-Lineman really worth the #3 pick. Orakpo would be the closest but he is still a tiny bit of a reach. BJ Raji is a huge reach. I want nothing to do with him. I don't like his attitude and he has done nothing to impress me.

    So with no D-Lineman other then Orakpo worth the #3 pick I say we go Curry if he is available. I would rather have DJ and AC on my team then play against them.

    We need Tank to bulk back up to play NT. He got very very good reviews when he played NT. Dorsey, Boone, McBride to take over the DE's. Hali, Curry, Vrabel, DJ for starting linebackers. Flowers, Carr, and Leggett as CB. Pollard, Page, McGraw, Morgan for Safeties.
    Pick up one of each D-lineman, LB, and Safety in FA and Draft.

    Get 2 OL in FA and Draft. I really wish the Chiefs would look at Harvey Dahl from the Falcons. I think he could anchor the right tackle position. Only problem is Falcons put a 2nd round tender on him.
    I still don't think you are getting much by taking a LB.

    Also, third round O-linemen are not usually the answer. But high first round OTs generally are.

    Most people dislike taking O-line, because those guys don't get spotlighted on ESPNs Plays Of The Week. But that is where our team has it's deficiencies.

    Brandon Albert is an OG and should be playing there. He was an amazing prospect at OG. We can have that, and still get an amazing prospect for our LOT spot too.

    The two biggest problems with our defense were Herm Edwards, and Jared Allen.

    Jared Isn't coming back. But neither is Herm.

    The switch to the 3-4 should generate instant pass-rush, to help replace JA.

    And any coach who recognizes that you can't run the "Tampa-2" without a pass rushing DE is a great start in the right direction.

    Between the new staff, and the decision to move to a 3-4, our defense is already leaps and bounds better than it was in '08.

    I don't believe, as many do, that all of the players on defense need to be replaced.

    Herm has been replaced, and I think that should take care of most of it.

    Although, I don't really trust the new guys yet either.

    Quote Originally Posted by Codac View Post
    Ok Mr. Pioli. Its true but at the same time its not. At this high in the draft you get the best player available.
    I don't like that "BPA" nonsense. You take the best player for your team. <BPFYT>

    I need to get that copywritten.

  7. #7
    Member Since
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    233

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chief31 View Post
    I still don't think you are getting much by taking a LB.

    Also, third round O-linemen are not usually the answer. But high first round OTs generally are.

    Most people dislike taking O-line, because those guys don't get spotlighted on ESPNs Plays Of The Week. But that is where our team has it's deficiencies.

    Brandon Albert is an OG and should be playing there. He was an amazing prospect at OG. We can have that, and still get an amazing prospect for our LOT spot too.

    The two biggest problems with our defense were Herm Edwards, and Jared Allen.

    Jared Isn't coming back. But neither is Herm.

    The switch to the 3-4 should generate instant pass-rush, to help replace JA.

    And any coach who recognizes that you can't run the "Tampa-2" without a pass rushing DE is a great start in the right direction.

    Between the new staff, and the decision to move to a 3-4, our defense is already leaps and bounds better than it was in '08.

    I don't believe, as many do, that all of the players on defense need to be replaced.

    Herm has been replaced, and I think that should take care of most of it.

    Although, I don't really trust the new guys yet either.



    I don't like that "BPA" nonsense. You take the best player for your team. <BPFYT>

    I need to get that copywritten.
    3 round OL arent the answers? tell that to Will Shields

    Even when we had Jared Allen he did nothing to help stop the teams running a road thru us.

    And yeah Herm made our offense worse. And defense no better. But it doesnt take a rocket scienctist to figure out that one.

    How is switching to the 3-4 going to creat INSTANT pass rush? The Browns use that and only got 17 sacks last year?

    :confused:

  8. #8
    Member Since
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Fort Madison, Iowa
    Posts
    1,467

    Default

    Actually this quote is very smart, as those of us who have watched many of drafts have seen teams repeatedly pick the player that fits in best with their needs and not the best player in the draft.

    Quote Originally Posted by honda522 View Post
    Its not about the best player, its about the right player

  9. #9
    Member Since
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    233

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bike View Post
    I don't see how St. Louis can look past Curry. I don't see how anybody could. He is the best football player in the draft.
    Needs out way the best player on the board. Perfect example is Dorsey last year. All those teams ahead of us pick needs over talent (except Oak but they dont count).

  10. #10
    Member Since
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Drunken State
    Posts
    4,842

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by warcrychief View Post
    Needs out way the best player on the board. Perfect example is Dorsey last year. All those teams ahead of us pick needs over talent (except Oak but they dont count).
    I kinda agree - but when you have needs on basically every position on the field.....why not take the best player on the board.
    SHUT IT

Page 1 of 16 1234511 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. dan reeves not taking the cowboys job
    By slc chief in forum The Locker Room
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-06-2009, 12:59 AM
  2. kiper has us taking sanchez at # 3
    By slc chief in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 64
    Last Post: 01-29-2009, 02:11 AM
  3. My 7 round Chiefs Mock
    By texaschief in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 50
    Last Post: 04-16-2008, 04:14 PM
  4. Latest ESPN mock draft
    By DrunkHillbilly in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 66
    Last Post: 03-29-2008, 03:11 PM
  5. warpaint chiefs mock draft...
    By texaschief in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 02-01-2008, 02:20 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •