Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 28

Thread: Why the Chiefs will NOT select Aaron Curry

  1. #1
    Member Since
    Oct 2008
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Posts
    2,205
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Default Why the Chiefs will NOT select Aaron Curry


    0 Not allowed!
    Dropping hints and stirring the pot: Why the Chiefs will NOT draft Aaron Curry | Red Zone

    Dropping hints and stirring the pot: Why the Chiefs will NOT draft Aaron Curry

    So a few things happened over the weekend that made me, at least for this moment, change my mind that Wake Forest linebacker Aaron Curry is the obvious, slam-dunk choice for the Chiefs to draft Saturday if they hold onto their No. 3 overall pick.

    Yes, it's still possible, and Kansas City doesn't need linebackers less after the weekend and Mike Vrabel's absence from the team's voluntary minicamp. But anyway, back on topic: The Chiefs, at least to me, are a lot more likely to take an offensive tackle in that spot than they were five days ago.

    In fairness, I get the feeling that the Chiefs' draft board was completed weeks ago. Things are always subject to change, but the way it works is that general manager Scott Pioli and his staff of merry men would generate a list of players, all of them ranked by how much the Chiefs want them. It was under a different regime, of course, but as it happened last year, the top overall player on the Chiefs' board was Glenn Dorsey. He fell to No. 5, and Kansas City got him, but the point was that if the Chiefs had the No. 1 overall pick, they'd determined that Dorsey was the best player out there, and they'd have taken him regardless of draft position.

    The top player is generated by a combination of talent, scouting reports, value and, I'd suspect, need. So who's at the top of the Chiefs' draft board this year? For months, I've written here that it must be Curry. HAS to be Curry. NEEDS to be Curry. And maybe it still is Curry.

    But here are the things I saw this weekend that makes me think that, well, it might not be Curry holding up a Chiefs jersey come mid-afternoon Saturday.

    - Brian Waters was a no-show. The Pro Bowl guard's absence underscored how far the Chiefs' offensive line still has to go. It's unclear yet whether Waters will be on this team when it lines up in the fall, and at the risk of speculating here, Waters' decision to skip Todd Haley's first minicamp was a bad sign for a team whose first priority is to get everyone on the same page. Without Waters, the Chiefs have exactly one offensive lineman they can realistically count on beyond this year and possibly next: Branden Albert. Factor Waters out of the equation, and here's the team's starting offensive line:

    LT Albert
    LG Wade Smith (who replaced Waters in first-team drills over the weekend)
    C Rudy Niswanger
    RG Mike Goff
    RT Damion McIntosh

    - Curry's agent was in Detroit this weekend. This is almost definitely a negotiating ploy from the Lions to quarterback Matthew Stafford's agent. It's designed to give the Lions a little more negotiating power as they try to seal a contract with whomever they'll make the No. 1 pick. They want that player signed before Saturday's draft, and sometimes teams have to play dirty. But it wouldn't be a shock if Detroit did take Curry at No. 1 overall. He's the safest pick in the draft, according to some experts, and as we learned three years ago when Houston took defensive end Mario Williams at No. 1 overall, sometimes it's a smart play to take a defender in that spot. To that end, the Chiefs might not even get the chance to draft Curry.

    - Pioli's close eye on the offensive line. I just don't think that, more than 20 years after his final snap as a college lineman, Pioli is still so interested in watching an NFL line that he hovers around it for at least three practices. Pioli was measuring everything during the three practices reporters were allowed to attend this weekend, but no unit got his attention quite like the offensive line. He stood uncomfortably close at times, not talking to anyone or smiling, and carrying with him a notepad and pen. It's possible that Pioli was sizing up exactly what the Chiefs have -- and likely finding out it's not as much as most NFL teams would like.

    - Matt Cassel's potential. It's clear that Cassel will be the Chiefs' starting quarterback, barring a catastrophe, if for no other reason than his $14 million guaranteed salary. But there's more to Cassel than that, including one of the most accurate arms the Chiefs have had on their roster in years. I saw Cassel make one bad throw the entire weekend, when he overthrew Bobby Engram on a corner post route Sunday. The trajectory on his passes is low and tight, and his passes generally arrive near receivers' numbers. It's something the Chiefs just haven't had in a long time, and I get the feeling they don't want anything to interfere with that.

    So with those four observations in mind, perhaps the Chiefs' greatest need really is offensive tackle. If they draft Eugene Monroe or Jason Smith at No. 3, yes, that's a high price for a right tackle -- even if Albert is shifted to somewhere other than left tackle -- but it also would almost definitely lock in a pair of oustanding bookend linemen for the next five to seven years. There's an incredible market for that in the NFL, and the value of two marquee tackles is as high as anything these days.

    The Chiefs need a linebacker and a pass rusher and a lot of other things. But after watching those guys this weekend, some things changed in my mind. We'll see Saturday how Pioli's mind processes it.
    I agree for the most part. On paper, Curry looks like the obvious choice if he falls to us. He's the best talent in the draft, our defense is terrible, and he plays a position that is currently unfilled. Yet I don't think he'll be the choice when it's all said and done.

    Note what he said about Cassel's minicamp showing last weekend. I'm loving that.
    Last edited by yashi; 04-20-2009 at 01:14 PM.

  2. #11
    Member Since
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Drunken State
    Posts
    4,003
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 50
    Given: 46

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by theaxeeffect4311 View Post
    Actually Mayo was selected tenth overall.
    Ha! And the media was spouting how NE was reaching to get Mayo...
    Gotta wonder if Pioli was here last year if Dorsey at 5 would be his pick!!
    SHUT IT

  3. #12
    Member Since
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    489
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by Bike View Post
    Ha! And the media was spouting how NE was reaching to get Mayo...
    Gotta wonder if Pioli was here last year if Dorsey at 5 would be his pick!!
    Pioli always drafts guys who fit his system. It just sucks that Dorsey is the one stuck in that mix while the Chiefs are switching systems. I like Dorsey and think he still has a lot of potential.

    Peterson never seemed to have a system.

  4. #13
    Member Since
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Drunken State
    Posts
    4,003
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 50
    Given: 46

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by theaxeeffect4311 View Post
    Pioli always drafts guys who fit his system. It just sucks that Dorsey is the one stuck in that mix while the Chiefs are switching systems. I like Dorsey and think he still has a lot of potential.

    Peterson never seemed to have a system.
    I'm not saying Dorsey is a bust...yet. We are just stuck with him and his 20 mil salary cap no matter how he performs.
    I was just implying that Pioli is such a huge upgrade over Peterson that things would have been much different (better) already had Clark pulled the plug a year ago...
    SHUT IT

  5. #14
    Member Since
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    489
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by Bike View Post
    I'm not saying Dorsey is a bust...yet. We are just stuck with him and his 20 mil salary cap no matter how he performs.
    I was just implying that Pioli is such a huge upgrade over Peterson that things would have been much different (better) already had Clark pulled the plug a year ago...
    I know, I was agreeing with you. I'm saying it was because Peterson did not have a plan or system that really hurt us. Pioli knows what he's running, has a system, and executes it. While we are stuck with Dorsey, for now, the only part that upsets me is that I think Dorsey could be a very good player, but his chances of leaving are not very good. I would like to see how he'd look on a team like the Bucs or Colts who run pretty effective Cover 2 defenses.

  6. #15
    Member Since
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,915
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by theaxeeffect4311 View Post
    I know, I was agreeing with you. I'm saying it was because Peterson did not have a plan or system that really hurt us. Pioli knows what he's running, has a system, and executes it. While we are stuck with Dorsey, for now, the only part that upsets me is that I think Dorsey could be a very good player, but his chances of leaving are not very good. I would like to see how he'd look on a team like the Bucs or Colts who run pretty effective Cover 2 defenses.
    I'm very interested to give Dorsey a shot as a 3-4 DE. He has more speed than the average DT. He just needs to get tougher against the run.

  7. #16
    Member Since
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    489
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by jmlamerson View Post
    I'm very interested to give Dorsey a shot as a 3-4 DE. He has more speed than the average DT. He just needs to get tougher against the run.

    I put that up to scheme. While Dorsey does need to get stronger, I am not sure I can blame his lack of ability all on him. A cover 2 defense like we were running last season is going to be terrible against the run. But it was also his rookie season. Most guys are trying to get used to the speed of the game.

    But you are not going to question his size for a 3-4 DE?

  8. #17
    Member Since
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,915
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by theaxeeffect4311 View Post
    I put that up to scheme. While Dorsey does need to get stronger, I am not sure I can blame his lack of ability all on him. A cover 2 defense like we were running last season is going to be terrible against the run. But it was also his rookie season. Most guys are trying to get used to the speed of the game.

    But you are not going to question his size for a 3-4 DE?
    The most underratedly bad move we made last season was cutting Napo. Although he wasn't exactly a great MLB, he was a consitent tackler and a legitimate presence in the middle of the field. Without a real MLB, teams had no fear on running over Dorsey.

    Although Dorsey was a rookie, rookie DTs still should not be blown up when one-on-one with an OG. I don't see his purpose on this team as a DT. He's not a run stuffer, and I don't see him as a legitimate Warren Sapp-style sack threat.

    Dorsey's a little short for the 3-4 DE position, but he's the right weight and has a the proper skill set. He's a squatter version of Aaron Smith. At the least, it's worth the shot.

  9. #18
    Member Since
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    489
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by jmlamerson View Post
    The most underratedly bad move we made last season was cutting Napo. Although he wasn't exactly a great MLB, he was a consitent tackler and a legitimate presence in the middle of the field. Without a real MLB, teams had no fear on running over Dorsey.

    Although Dorsey was a rookie, rookie DTs still should not be blown up when one-on-one with an OG. I don't see his purpose on this team as a DT. He's not a run stuffer, and I don't see him as a legitimate Warren Sapp-style sack threat.

    Dorsey's a little short for the 3-4 DE position, but he's the right weight and has a the proper skill set. He's a squatter version of Aaron Smith. At the least, it's worth the shot.
    I agree that Harris should not have been cut. Dorsey has some things that he needs to learn. I think it's interesting that you think he's not a run stuffer, but has the proper skills to play 3-4 DE. I think Dorsey can be a DT on the right team.

  10. #19
    Member Since
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Kansas City Missouri
    Posts
    3,814
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by KansasCityChris View Post
    LB has been filled but not on a long term basis
    Well said brother.
    <a href=http://www.chiefscrowd.com/forums/../../../../image.php?type=sigpic&userid=2553&dateline=1258934108 target=_blank>http://www.chiefscrowd.com/forums/.....ine=1258934108</a>

  11. #20
    Member Since
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    414
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    youve certainly made a good argument. I think adding one of the top OT at no.3 would solidify our offense for years to come. we would have a better improved ground and air game...

    adding curry would certainly improve the defense, but theres still so many holes to fill on defense...

    and matt cassell, bowe, lj and tony g would go to waste if the o-line blows...

    hmm...4 more days :) I hope we can trade down personally...but i dont think its gonna happen...

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Who wants Aaron Curry?
    By AussieChiefsFan in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 04-07-2009, 02:56 PM
  2. What about Aaron Curry
    By AussieChiefsFan in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 02-23-2009, 04:52 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •