Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 28

Thread: Why the Chiefs will NOT select Aaron Curry

  1. #1
    Member Since
    Oct 2008
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Posts
    2,205

    Default Why the Chiefs will NOT select Aaron Curry

    Dropping hints and stirring the pot: Why the Chiefs will NOT draft Aaron Curry | Red Zone

    Dropping hints and stirring the pot: Why the Chiefs will NOT draft Aaron Curry

    So a few things happened over the weekend that made me, at least for this moment, change my mind that Wake Forest linebacker Aaron Curry is the obvious, slam-dunk choice for the Chiefs to draft Saturday if they hold onto their No. 3 overall pick.

    Yes, it's still possible, and Kansas City doesn't need linebackers less after the weekend and Mike Vrabel's absence from the team's voluntary minicamp. But anyway, back on topic: The Chiefs, at least to me, are a lot more likely to take an offensive tackle in that spot than they were five days ago.

    In fairness, I get the feeling that the Chiefs' draft board was completed weeks ago. Things are always subject to change, but the way it works is that general manager Scott Pioli and his staff of merry men would generate a list of players, all of them ranked by how much the Chiefs want them. It was under a different regime, of course, but as it happened last year, the top overall player on the Chiefs' board was Glenn Dorsey. He fell to No. 5, and Kansas City got him, but the point was that if the Chiefs had the No. 1 overall pick, they'd determined that Dorsey was the best player out there, and they'd have taken him regardless of draft position.

    The top player is generated by a combination of talent, scouting reports, value and, I'd suspect, need. So who's at the top of the Chiefs' draft board this year? For months, I've written here that it must be Curry. HAS to be Curry. NEEDS to be Curry. And maybe it still is Curry.

    But here are the things I saw this weekend that makes me think that, well, it might not be Curry holding up a Chiefs jersey come mid-afternoon Saturday.

    - Brian Waters was a no-show. The Pro Bowl guard's absence underscored how far the Chiefs' offensive line still has to go. It's unclear yet whether Waters will be on this team when it lines up in the fall, and at the risk of speculating here, Waters' decision to skip Todd Haley's first minicamp was a bad sign for a team whose first priority is to get everyone on the same page. Without Waters, the Chiefs have exactly one offensive lineman they can realistically count on beyond this year and possibly next: Branden Albert. Factor Waters out of the equation, and here's the team's starting offensive line:

    LT Albert
    LG Wade Smith (who replaced Waters in first-team drills over the weekend)
    C Rudy Niswanger
    RG Mike Goff
    RT Damion McIntosh

    - Curry's agent was in Detroit this weekend. This is almost definitely a negotiating ploy from the Lions to quarterback Matthew Stafford's agent. It's designed to give the Lions a little more negotiating power as they try to seal a contract with whomever they'll make the No. 1 pick. They want that player signed before Saturday's draft, and sometimes teams have to play dirty. But it wouldn't be a shock if Detroit did take Curry at No. 1 overall. He's the safest pick in the draft, according to some experts, and as we learned three years ago when Houston took defensive end Mario Williams at No. 1 overall, sometimes it's a smart play to take a defender in that spot. To that end, the Chiefs might not even get the chance to draft Curry.

    - Pioli's close eye on the offensive line. I just don't think that, more than 20 years after his final snap as a college lineman, Pioli is still so interested in watching an NFL line that he hovers around it for at least three practices. Pioli was measuring everything during the three practices reporters were allowed to attend this weekend, but no unit got his attention quite like the offensive line. He stood uncomfortably close at times, not talking to anyone or smiling, and carrying with him a notepad and pen. It's possible that Pioli was sizing up exactly what the Chiefs have -- and likely finding out it's not as much as most NFL teams would like.

    - Matt Cassel's potential. It's clear that Cassel will be the Chiefs' starting quarterback, barring a catastrophe, if for no other reason than his $14 million guaranteed salary. But there's more to Cassel than that, including one of the most accurate arms the Chiefs have had on their roster in years. I saw Cassel make one bad throw the entire weekend, when he overthrew Bobby Engram on a corner post route Sunday. The trajectory on his passes is low and tight, and his passes generally arrive near receivers' numbers. It's something the Chiefs just haven't had in a long time, and I get the feeling they don't want anything to interfere with that.

    So with those four observations in mind, perhaps the Chiefs' greatest need really is offensive tackle. If they draft Eugene Monroe or Jason Smith at No. 3, yes, that's a high price for a right tackle -- even if Albert is shifted to somewhere other than left tackle -- but it also would almost definitely lock in a pair of oustanding bookend linemen for the next five to seven years. There's an incredible market for that in the NFL, and the value of two marquee tackles is as high as anything these days.

    The Chiefs need a linebacker and a pass rusher and a lot of other things. But after watching those guys this weekend, some things changed in my mind. We'll see Saturday how Pioli's mind processes it.
    I agree for the most part. On paper, Curry looks like the obvious choice if he falls to us. He's the best talent in the draft, our defense is terrible, and he plays a position that is currently unfilled. Yet I don't think he'll be the choice when it's all said and done.

    Note what he said about Cassel's minicamp showing last weekend. I'm loving that.
    Last edited by yashi; 04-20-2009 at 01:14 PM.

  2. #2
    Member Since
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Fort Madison, Iowa
    Posts
    1,467

    Default

    Very interesting, nice read. I have decided I am done speculating on the Draft because I will know for sure who the Chiefs are picking in a little less than 6 days!!!!WOOT!

  3. #3
    Member Since
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Nebraska
    Posts
    7,498

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Vanilla Garilla View Post
    Very interesting, nice read. I have decided I am done speculating on the Draft because I will know for sure who the Chiefs are picking in a little less than 6 days!!!!WOOT!
    I will be gone all weekend on the road, have to go to Colorado for a wedding. I know that I will have major post overload when I finally get to log on after draft! I hope I can at least get some news.




    We should do a sports bet, how high the post count for draft weekend! Godfather make it happen.

  4. #4
    Member Since
    Oct 2008
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Posts
    2,205

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KansasCityChris View Post
    LB has been filled but not on a long term basis, don't forget we picked up Vrabel, Thomas and Beisel, all potential starters.
    Well, there's still room for 1 more starting LB in 3-4 if you do not consider Beisel starter material, which I don't. And of course like you mentioned the only long-term LB we have is DJ.

  5. #5
    Member Since
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,915

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KansasCityChris View Post
    LB has been filled but not on a long term basis, don't forget we picked up Vrabel, Thomas and Beisel, all potential starters.
    Well, yeah. But these guys are stopgaps until we can draft real LBs. We needed warm bodies for 2009 at ILB and we got them cheap.

    You do know how many LBs we've drafted in the past three years, right? Zero. That's right, none. Pioli is being forced to start from scratch here.

  6. #6
    Member Since
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,915

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by yashi View Post
    I agree for the most part. On paper, Curry looks like the obvious choice if he falls to us. He's the best talent in the draft, our defense is terrible, and he plays a position that is currently unfilled. Yet I don't think he'll be the choice when it's all said and done.

    Note what he said about Cassel's minicamp showing last weekend. I'm loving that.
    I cannot see Pioli paying $10M to $12M a year for an OLB. Ever. Which is why I think you're right - we go OT or trade down.

  7. #7
    Member Since
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Fort Madison, Iowa
    Posts
    1,467

    Default

    Is everyone forgetting that Pioli and company selected Mayo with their first pick last season with the Patriots?

  8. #8
    Member Since
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,915

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Vanilla Garilla View Post
    Is everyone forgetting that Pioli and company selected Mayo with their first pick last season with the Patriots?
    No, everyone remembers. But he only took Mayo after he built the best DL in the league and one of the best OLs in the league.

    And there is a massive salary difference between 3 and 7.

  9. #9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jmlamerson View Post
    No, everyone remembers. But he only took Mayo after he built the best DL in the league and one of the best OLs in the league.

    And there is a massive salary difference between 3 and 7.
    Actually Mayo was selected tenth overall.

  10. #10
    Member Since
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,915

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by theaxeeffect4311 View Post
    Actually Mayo was selected tenth overall.
    Ah, that's right. They traded down with the Saints. Thanks.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Who wants Aaron Curry?
    By AussieChiefsFan in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 04-07-2009, 02:56 PM
  2. What about Aaron Curry
    By AussieChiefsFan in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 02-23-2009, 04:52 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •