Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Pats trying to trade up to top 10

  1. #1
    Member Since
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    120
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Default Pats trying to trade up to top 10


    0 Not allowed!
    Straight from Rotoworld.com

    The Patriots are trying to move into the Top-10 of the draft, according to SI's Peter King.

    The Pats are believed to have offered their first-round pick and the middle of their three second-round picks for the Jags No. 8 overall pick, but Jacksonville turned it down. King does not believe the Pats are after Tyson Jackson despite his obvious fit as a 3-4 defensive end. The Pats' target is said to be a "surprise."
    ----------------------------------

    The main reason i post this is because it's the Pats. I wonder....3 Spot may be a bit higher than the Pats want to get.

  2. #2
    Member Since
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Lewisville, TX (Dallas)
    Posts
    1,192
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 30
    Given: 22

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    I would love to trade with them and get thier first and our second back. That would mean we got a QB and LB for swapping first rounds pick.

  3. #3
    Member Since
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Salina, KS
    Posts
    360
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    With less than 28 hours til the draft, there are so many rumors floating about that it is crazy! I wish Stafford would sign with the Lions, so they don't screw up every chance we have to trade down. If they take Curry, it throws a monkey wrench in the whole draft, IMO.
    http://www.chiefscrowd.com/forums/image.php?u=2574&type=sigpic&dateline=1233413652

  4. #4
    Member Since
    Oct 2007
    Location
    tucson
    Posts
    4,244
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 29
    Given: 0

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by N TX Dave View Post
    I would love to trade with them and get thier first and our second back. That would mean we got a QB and LB for swapping first rounds pick.

    thier 1st and our 2nd back doesnt equal the gap between our two 1st's..

  5. #5
    Member Since
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Lewisville, TX (Dallas)
    Posts
    1,192
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 30
    Given: 22

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by Pro_Angler View Post
    thier 1st and our 2nd back doesnt equal the gap between our two 1st's..
    Yes but they threw in two players also one just happens to be a QB. So in actuallity we would have swapped the first round picks and got two named players as opposed to two players to be named.

  6. #6
    Member Since
    Oct 2007
    Location
    tucson
    Posts
    4,244
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 29
    Given: 0

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by N TX Dave View Post
    Yes but they threw in two players also one just happens to be a QB. So in actuallity we would have swapped the first round picks and got two named players as opposed to two players to be named.

    different deal...this would be a whole different deal and if so It wouldn't make the previous trade for Cassell/Vrabel near as sweet.

Similar Threads

  1. Jay Marrioti wants the Pats - Chiefs trade investigated!
    By stricken721 in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 03-04-2009, 05:31 PM
  2. MNF Eagles at Pats!
    By hermhater in forum The Locker Room
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 11-26-2007, 06:48 PM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-04-2007, 01:41 AM
  4. Pats Vs. Colts
    By anaeelbackwards in forum The Locker Room
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-31-2007, 02:56 PM
  5. TRADE! TRADE! TRADE! Building for the Future
    By Cisco Kid in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 04-26-2007, 07:15 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •