Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Lions took Stafford

  1. #1

    Default Lions took Stafford

    Well he is offically a lion so at least we KNOW we will at least get Curry. The Rams bluffed about Sanchez hopefully they dont fall for that and that leaves a great oppurtunity for us for someone to trade up/ But like I said no matter what we have Curry for sure

  2. #2
    Member Since
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Ventura, Ca.
    Posts
    2,607

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bigpoppachief View Post
    Well he is offically a lion so at least we KNOW we will at least get Curry. The Rams bluffed about Sanchez hopefully they dont fall for that and that leaves a great oppurtunity for us for someone to trade up/ But like I said no matter what we have Curry for sure
    We might have a shot at him. I am not confident that Pioli will take him.


    Are you man enough? Eric Berry? Apparently Not!

  3. #3
    Member Since
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    10,594

    Default

    There is only one thing at the moment that will sorta cheer me up from the TG trade. (TG has been my favorite player and my 'HERO' since I started liking NFL. So that's why I'm disappointed.) The thing that will sorta cheer me up is we get Aaron Curry. He's been my favorite Player in this years draft since I heard about him many months ago.

  4. #4
    Member Since
    Feb 2009
    Location
    N. Cal
    Posts
    131

    Default

    Unless we trade down, looks like we are going to get Curry.

  5. #5
    Member Since
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    1,549

    Default

    i hope Pioli realizes curry is not the pick for us. we have LB's comming out our butt. it is not a position of need. if you want to go defense pick a NT, or DE. or an OL to help our running game get going and protect our young QB. i will be so rippin mad if we pick curry. don't buy into the hype that he is a can't miss prototypical Lpro

  6. #6
    Member Since
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,582

    Default

    I don't see why we *have to* get Curry. Our needs are many, especially on the lines, so I'll be happy if we take a beastly pass rusher, or even someone to offset Branden Albert as the other bookend.

    If we take Curry- yay. If we don't, we'll take someone else, and hopefully that will be a good player as well.

    I'd rather trade out of that spot to pick up some more players. We're only selecting ONE guy today, at this point.

    jb

  7. #7
    Member Since
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Read the name dumbass!!
    Posts
    13,363

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chiefnut View Post
    i hope Pioli realizes curry is not the pick for us. we have LB's comming out our butt. it is not a position of need. if you want to go defense pick a NT, or DE. or an OL to help our running game get going and protect our young QB. i will be so rippin mad if we pick curry. don't buy into the hype that he is a can't miss prototypical Lpro
    I am not against Curry as we will need some young guys who can play. I think DJ and Curry could learn a lot and improve their game a lot with guys like Vrabel and Thomas around (who will probably only be there for a year ot two) It is for that reason that I wouldn't mind getting Curry. Preferably we will trade down and get a few picks. I guess this is the bright side of a 2-14 team. No matter who we pick it will fill a need!!
    The only reason a beer sweats around Canada is because he's decided it will be the next beer he drinks.

  8. #8
    Member Since
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    1,549

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Canada View Post
    I am not against Curry as we will need some young guys who can play. I think DJ and Curry could learn a lot and improve their game a lot with guys like Vrabel and Thomas around (who will probably only be there for a year ot two) It is for that reason that I wouldn't mind getting Curry. Preferably we will trade down and get a few picks. I guess this is the bright side of a 2-14 team. No matter who we pick it will fill a need!!
    Curry may be a great backer, but with only one pick in the first two rounds i don't think any LB is a good pick for us this year. can we use him? is he an upgrade? maybe.....but where do we need immediate improvement most? is it at LB? NO

  9. #9
    Member Since
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Read the name dumbass!!
    Posts
    13,363

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chiefnut View Post
    Curry may be a great backer, but with only one pick in the first two rounds i don't think any LB is a good pick for us this year. can we use him? is he an upgrade? maybe.....but where do we need immediate improvement most? is it at LB? NO
    No doubt, that is why myfirst choice would be to trade down. And like I said any position is a position of need (at least long term at some (LB)) Vrabel and Thomas are shot term fixes,but that being said I would not be opposed to an O or D lineman. Fortunately we only have to wait 6 hours 52 minutes and 30 second +the first two picks and we will know!!

    I gotta goget some zzzz's now. Worked nites and gotta be up for the draft!!
    The only reason a beer sweats around Canada is because he's decided it will be the next beer he drinks.

  10. #10
    Member Since
    Oct 2007
    Location
    tucson
    Posts
    4,553

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chiefnut View Post
    i hope Pioli realizes curry is not the pick for us. we have LB's comming out our butt. it is not a position of need. if you want to go defense pick a NT, or DE. or an OL to help our running game get going and protect our young QB. i will be so rippin mad if we pick curry. don't buy into the hype that he is a can't miss prototypical Lpro

    none worth #3 money though..

Similar Threads

  1. lions negotiating with stafford,smith,curry
    By slc chief in forum The Locker Room
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-19-2009, 08:15 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •