Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 29

Thread: 2008 v. 2009

  1. #1
    Member Since
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,915

    Default 2008 v. 2009

    For those of you not thinking that the Chiefs have improved by leaps and bounds, a quick review (obviously subject to change) of the differences between this year and last year:

    Starting QB:
    2008 - Thigpen/Huard/Croyle
    2009 - Cassel

    Some of you don't think that the 10-5 Cassel is a better QB than the 1-9 Thigpen. Be prepared to be proven wrong.

    Edge: 2009

    RBs:
    2008 - LJ/Kolby/Charles/Savage
    2009 - LJ/Kolby/Charles/Williams

    Basically the same in personnel - RB is a surprising strength of the team. I think the big difference between 2008 and 2009 will be the level of LJJ effort.

    Edge: Even

    WRs:
    2008 - Bowe/Bradley/Franklin/Webb
    2009 - Bowe/Engram/Bradley/Copper

    Bowe and Bradley are solid WRs, but having a sure handed Engram at 2WR makes this WR corps suddenly the 2nd best in the division.

    Edge: 2009

    TE:
    2008 - Gonzalez/Cottam
    2009 - Cottam/Ryan/O'Connell

    Our most obvious drop off in talent. Tony G. will be very missed.

    Edge: 2008

    OL:
    2008 - Albert/Waters/Niswanger/Jones/McIntosh
    2009 - Albert/Waters/Goff/Niswanger/Brown

    No question, the 2009 OL is better. I still think were a ways away from "good" though.

    Edge: 2009

    DL:
    2008 - Boone/Dorsey/Tank/Hali
    2009 - Dorsey/Tank/Jackson/Magee

    Again, no question. The 2009 DL is vastly improved over the 208 version, especially against the run. Most of our sacks will come from our OLBs, as we're going to primarily be running a 3-4.

    LB:
    2008 - DJ/Pat Thomas/Williams/Donnie
    2009 - DJ/Zach Thomas/Williams/Vrabel

    Big edge to 2009. Vrabel and Zach Thomas are a bit past their primes. But they're immeidate upgrades over what we had. Not to mention that Beisel's a far better reserve than Boiman.

    DBs:
    2008 - Flowers/Carr/Leggett/Page/Pollard
    2009 - Flowers/Carr/Leggett/Washington/Page/Pollard

    Not much of a change. Washington will bring some height and speed to our CB corps, but he's too unproven and has to many questions to be considered a major upgrade.

    I realy wish we could have found a way to upgrade Page at FS. He's a ballhawk, sure, but he isn't nearly tough enough to play FS in a 3-4.

    Edge: Even

    PR/KR:
    2008 - Robinson/Charles
    2009 - Lawrence

    Lawrence is unproven, sure, but anything is better than another year of Robinson/Charles at PR/KR.

    Edge: 2009

    K/P:
    2008 - Barth/Colquitt
    2009 - Barth/Succop/Colquitt

    Too early to tell. My gut says we use Succop on kickoffs at least, which should give us some improvement there.

    Slight Edge: 2009

    HC/OC/DC:
    2008 - Herm/Gailey/Gunther
    2009 - Haley/Gailey/Pendergast

    By virture of having an IQ over 50 and not being senile, our 2009 HC and DC defeat our 2008 HC and DC.

    Big Edge: 2009

    So, except for TE, we're a better team, or at least no worse, pretty much across the board. We were an immensely untalented team in 2008 (I still have no idea how we won that Denver game), and Pioli's doing the best he can to find legitimate starters at most positions.

    With this talent and coaching staff, we should be looking at 6-8 wins. Which is pretty good for a young team trying to rebuild.

  2. #11
    Member Since
    Oct 2008
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Posts
    2,205

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jmlamerson View Post
    You mean 2009, right? Unless you are really optimistic about the Chiefs playoff chances.
    oops

    I've been reading a lot about Madden 2010 and I keep forgetting it's always a year ahead.

  3. #12
    Member Since
    Jun 2005
    Location
    San Antonio, TX
    Posts
    3,846

    Default

    So, this is zero sum to you? Edwards, in YOUR mind, wouldn't have added ANY free agents or drafted ANY players whatsoever?

    That's bull.

    We know we would've had:

    DL:
    Hali, Dorsey, Tank, ?

    LB:
    DJ, ?, Curry

    DB:
    Flowers, Pollard, ?, Carr

    OL:
    Albert, Waters, Niswanger, ?, ?, Gonzalez

    RB:
    ?, Charles, Smith, Savage

    QB:
    Thigpen, Croyle, ?

    WR:
    Bowe, Bradley, ?, ?


    The way I see it, the Chiefs have signed 4 impact free agents. Of the 8 question marks that the Chiefs would've had in their starting rotation, at least 4 of those would've been filled by free agents. Then, we also wouldn't have had to replace so many players in the draft or reach so high to get the guys we wanted.

    We'd be in a MUCH better position if we hadn't changed the overall direction of the team.

  4. #13
    Member Since
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Fort Madison, Iowa
    Posts
    1,467

    Default

    Excellent Post JMLamerson, great way to look at the vast improvement we already can see "on paper' over last year.

  5. #14
    Member Since
    Oct 2008
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Posts
    2,205

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by texaschief View Post
    So, this is zero sum to you? Edwards, in YOUR mind, wouldn't have added ANY free agents or drafted ANY players whatsoever?

    That's bull.

    We know we would've had:

    DL:
    Hali, Dorsey, Tank, ?

    LB:
    DJ, ?, Curry

    DB:
    Flowers, Pollard, ?, Carr

    OL:
    Albert, Waters, Niswanger, ?, ?, Gonzalez

    RB:
    ?, Charles, Smith, Savage

    QB:
    Thigpen, Croyle, ?

    WR:
    Bowe, Bradley, ?, ?


    The way I see it, the Chiefs have signed 4 impact free agents. Of the 8 question marks that the Chiefs would've had in their starting rotation, at least 4 of those would've been filled by free agents. Then, we also wouldn't have had to replace so many players in the draft or reach so high to get the guys we wanted.

    We'd be in a MUCH better position if we hadn't changed the overall direction of the team.
    he's talking about 2008 v 2009 (title of the thread).

  6. #15
    Member Since
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Fort Madison, Iowa
    Posts
    1,467

    Default

    There is always so many negative Chiefs fans on here anymore. Lets see some optimism folks, we have a lot to look forward too. This draft was a good one, and this off season has been wonderful for us Chiefs.

  7. #16
    Member Since
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,915

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by texaschief View Post
    So, this is zero sum to you? Edwards, in YOUR mind, wouldn't have added ANY free agents or drafted ANY players whatsoever?

    That's bull.
    Herm would have done what he did the previous three years. He would have signed bad free agents and he would have drafted badly. We didn't have any in-their-prime Pro Bowlers to trade off, so he probably would had eight draft picks (one through six and two sevenths).

    Quote Originally Posted by texaschief View Post
    We know we would've had:

    DL:
    Hali, Dorsey, Tank, ?

    LB:
    DJ, ?, Curry

    DB:
    Flowers, Pollard, ?, Carr

    OL:
    Albert, Waters, Niswanger, ?, ?, Gonzalez

    RB:
    ?, Charles, Smith, Savage

    QB:
    Thigpen, Croyle, ?

    WR:
    Bowe, Bradley, ?, ?
    I agree. That would have been our base roster. Our terrible, terrible base roster that won two games in 2008. Except that Herm would have kept Franklin and Webb as our WRs.

    Quote Originally Posted by texaschief View Post
    The way I see it, the Chiefs have signed 4 impact free agents. Of the 8 question marks that the Chiefs would've had in their starting rotation, at least 4 of those would've been filled by free agents. Then, we also wouldn't have had to replace so many players in the draft or reach so high to get the guys we wanted.
    The Chiefs have signed the following starters as FAs/trades under Pioli:

    Cassel
    Vrabel
    Zach Thomas
    Engram
    Goff

    We also signed numerous FAs to help with our special teams/depth, like Copper, Daniels, and Beisel. We drafted starters at LDE, RDE, RT, K, and KR/PR. We drafted depth at CB, RB, and TE.

    Who, exactly, would Herm have signed? Isn't it a whole lot more likely that he would have kept with the "youth movement" and sought to fix those problems in the draft or hope that his existing players improve? And assuming our first pick was for Curry at MLB, would we really have found starters at DE, OLB, RG, RT, FS, and HB in the 2nd thorugh 7th rounds? How could anyone really still believe that we could plug low round picks into the lineup and let Herm coach them into starters?

    And whole 'nother year of the Cover 2 defense would have been about as effective as it had been in 2008.
    Last edited by Coach; 04-27-2009 at 11:24 PM. Reason: babysitted comments

  8. #17
    Member Since
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,915

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by yashi View Post
    he's talking about 2008 v 2009 (title of the thread).
    Yeah, I really wasn't trying to turn this into a thread about whether Herm Edwards sucks, just that we've improved over 2008.

    Except for a few pitiful people, everyone knows Herm Edwards sucked. No need to rehash it.

  9. #18
    Member Since
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    35

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jmlamerson View Post
    HC/OC/DC:
    2008 - Herm/Gailey/Gunther
    2009 - Haley/Gailey/Pendergast

    By virture of having an IQ over 50 and not being senile, our 2009 HC and DC defeat our 2008 HC and DC.

    Big Edge: 2009

    Haha, great!

  10. #19
    Member Since
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,915

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Vanilla Garilla View Post
    Excellent Post JMLamerson, great way to look at the vast improvement we already can see "on paper' over last year.
    Thanks!

  11. #20
    Member Since
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    2

    Default

    Hoping Washington impresses early and often at training camp. Kiper said before that Donald has one of the best grades at the film review portion of the combine. Donald made a mistake in college, everyone makes mistakes. He has admitted to them and he has changed his way of life. I played high school football with Donald and remain a close friend to him, and has told me all the time he has his head on straight now. He can also fill in and play nickel back. I wasn't a chiefs fan before yesterday but you better believe they are now my favorite team in the NFL along with the Colts. Donald will open some eyes his rookie year. He was always under the radar, and didn't any of you see all the espn analysts saying if Donald would have stayed for his senior year he would have been a 1st rounder next year. GO CHIEFS!!!

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Mr. Irrelevant 2009
    By jap1 in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 03-27-2009, 01:49 PM
  2. when does 2009 schedule come out?
    By wubfree in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 03-02-2009, 08:12 PM
  3. 2009 home opener
    By Canada in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 01-05-2009, 12:15 AM
  4. 2009 potential
    By section311 in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 11-27-2008, 07:22 PM
  5. Ncaa 2009
    By bigpoppachief in forum The Locker Room
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-21-2008, 02:03 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •