Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 29

Thread: Chiefs Madden 10 Ratings

  1. #1
    Member Since
    Oct 2008
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Posts
    2,205

    Default Chiefs Madden 10 Ratings

    This could be fun to discuss.

    Madden Ratings - ESPN

    Wish they were a little more up to date with the Mike Brown signing and such, but it'll be fixed by week 1 probably.

    Thigpen and Charles were screwed over.

    Bradley's injury rating is laughable.. it should be one of the lowest in the game. Somehow Zach Thomas is much lower.

  2. #11
    Member Since
    Sep 2007
    Location
    RIGHT NEXT TO ARROWHEAD!
    Posts
    18,752

    Default

    Colquitt got screwed.
    http://arrowheadjunkies.com/pictures/PhotoShop/sig_pics/NFL_Players/kansas_city_chiefs/tyson.jackson/062009/tyson.jackson.500.png

  3. #12
    Member Since
    Sep 2005
    Location
    SE Kansas
    Posts
    31,643

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hermhater View Post
    Colquitt got screwed.
    Yep!

  4. #13
    Member Since
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Miles City, Montana
    Posts
    2,115

    Default

    I think the ratings look right.... I mean it sucks that we aren't rated higher and stuff but last year we did suck (2-14) so i can understand the rating but like other people are saying in here they will go up (if you have an online account) if the chiefs perform very well.

  5. #14
    Member Since
    Sep 2007
    Location
    RIGHT NEXT TO ARROWHEAD!
    Posts
    18,752

    Default

    This thread is now about Colquitt dude.

    Get with the program.
    http://arrowheadjunkies.com/pictures/PhotoShop/sig_pics/NFL_Players/kansas_city_chiefs/tyson.jackson/062009/tyson.jackson.500.png

  6. #15
    Member Since
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    2,246

    Default

    Wow, IMO, Flowers, Carr, and Colquitt really got the shaft. Those guys are much better than that stupid rating. I think Thigpen should be in the low 70s and Cassel should be in the mid 80s.

    On the opposite side of the spectrum, they gave our O-line too much credit! Waters is still very good, but 94?! I'd take that down to 90ish. Sackintosh got in the 70s?! That's a joke.
    C:\Users\Master Sin\Desktop\thumb_pl_180492.jpg

  7. #16
    Member Since
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Fort Madison, Iowa
    Posts
    1,467

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Three7s View Post
    Wow, IMO, Flowers, Carr, and Colquitt really got the shaft. Those guys are much better than that stupid rating. I think Thigpen should be in the low 70s and Cassel should be in the mid 80s.

    On the opposite side of the spectrum, they gave our O-line too much credit! Waters is still very good, but 94?! I'd take that down to 90ish. Sackintosh got in the 70s?! That's a joke.
    I agree with all of that

  8. #17
    Member Since
    Oct 2008
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Posts
    2,205

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Three7s View Post
    Wow, IMO, Flowers, Carr, and Colquitt really got the shaft. Those guys are much better than that stupid rating. I think Thigpen should be in the low 70s and Cassel should be in the mid 80s.

    On the opposite side of the spectrum, they gave our O-line too much credit! Waters is still very good, but 94?! I'd take that down to 90ish. Sackintosh got in the 70s?! That's a joke.
    Waters a 94 was a little surprising, but then again he was a pro bowler last year so they're inclined to rate him pretty high.

    Funniest thing is, if anyone got the shaft it's the Broncos OL. Ours is about equal, maybe even a little better in the game! Clady is only an 88!

    I wish we still had Wiegmann.

  9. #18
    Member Since
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    994

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jmlamerson View Post
    Ouch. EA sports does not have much in the way of faith in the Chiefs in 2010. Thigpen is 66 overall?!
    No they don't but how many of us did 6 months ago? LMAO!

    His completion percentage was 30th (54.8%) out of 32 QB's that had a minimum of 14 attempts per game. I mean it is a big difference when the #20 QB was at 60% and the #1 was 67.4. Thiggy's QB rating was a 76 which is 27th of 32.

    Maybe he should be 70 or a little higher but that would be a stretch to me.

  10. #19
    Member Since
    Sep 2005
    Location
    SE Kansas
    Posts
    31,643

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dbolan View Post
    No they don't but how many of us did 6 months ago? LMAO!

    His completion percentage was 30th (54.8%) out of 32 QB's that had a minimum of 14 attempts per game. I mean it is a big difference when the #20 QB was at 60% and the #1 was 67.4. Thiggy's QB rating was a 76 which is 27th of 32.

    Maybe he should be 70 or a little higher but that would be a stretch to me.
    Good Question.

  11. #20
    Member Since
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    2,246

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dbolan View Post
    No they don't but how many of us did 6 months ago? LMAO!

    His completion percentage was 30th (54.8%) out of 32 QB's that had a minimum of 14 attempts per game. I mean it is a big difference when the #20 QB was at 60% and the #1 was 67.4. Thiggy's QB rating was a 76 which is 27th of 32.

    Maybe he should be 70 or a little higher but that would be a stretch to me.
    Analysts and Journalists always talk about that as their crutch. They forget that the Raiders and Falcons game screwed him over. He was so ridiculously awful that it ruined his season as far as stats go. Once he took the field against the Jets, he was a different QB.
    C:\Users\Master Sin\Desktop\thumb_pl_180492.jpg

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Ratings for some latest songs
    By AussieChiefsFan in forum The Locker Room
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-14-2009, 01:58 AM
  2. Madden '09 Player Ratings
    By Nel Toille in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 06-25-2008, 09:47 PM
  3. Cool Madden Chiefs game video
    By YZILLA in forum The Locker Room
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-02-2007, 10:35 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •