Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 29

Thread: Could the 1969 Chiefs beat?

  1. #1
    Member Since
    Aug 2007
    Location
    OKC, OK
    Posts
    3,715
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Default Could the 1969 Chiefs beat?


    0 Not allowed!
    Could the 1969 Chiefs beat the 2007 Colts if they could have ever played each other?
    <a href=http://img218.imageshack.us/img218/5893/dthomassp2.jpg target=_blank>http://img218.imageshack.us/img218/5893/dthomassp2.jpg</a>

    Official thread killer I have heard.

  2. #11
    Member Since
    Jun 2006
    Location
    western kentucky
    Posts
    107
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    I wouldn't sell my house. But mabey take out a loan!

  3. #12
    Member Since
    Sep 2005
    Location
    SE Kansas
    Posts
    28,127
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 255
    Given: 448

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by KC-Krazo View Post
    YES If they used the old rules. I really don't think any QB's today could play in those beat down fest's.They really were brutal back in the day!!!!
    ...Don't kid yourself; it's just as dirty in the trenches today as it was back then, but I do agree that the players were tougher back then. Today huge salaries has necessitated the feeling that these guys need to be baby coddled; they seem to be out a minimum of at least two to four weeks for what seems to be nothing more then a hang nail comparatively speaking.

    Did you hear the advise that Jared Allen gave "Tank" or Turk, one of those two, in the Hard Knocks show? "Kick 'em in the nuts".


  4. #13
    Member Since
    May 2006
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    9,148
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 31
    Given: 27

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Players today are far stronger and much faster than they were then. Manning would throw alot of quick passes and wear-down the lesser conditioned players. Then, late in the game, the Chiefs would be out of gas.

    Purely hypothetical, but that's what I would expect.

  5. #14
    Member Since
    Sep 2005
    Location
    SE Kansas
    Posts
    28,127
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 255
    Given: 448

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by chief31 View Post
    Players today are far stronger and much faster than they were then. Manning would throw alot of quick passes and wear-down the lesser conditioned players. Then, late in the game, the Chiefs would be out of gas.

    Purely hypothetical, but that's what I would expect.
    Agreed; the game has evolved to a much higher standard.


  6. #15
    Member Since
    Aug 2007
    Location
    OKC, OK
    Posts
    3,715
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by chief31 View Post
    Players today are far stronger and much faster than they were then. Manning would throw alot of quick passes and wear-down the lesser conditioned players. Then, late in the game, the Chiefs would be out of gas.

    Purely hypothetical, but that's what I would expect.
    Yes by all means!
    <a href=http://img218.imageshack.us/img218/5893/dthomassp2.jpg target=_blank>http://img218.imageshack.us/img218/5893/dthomassp2.jpg</a>

    Official thread killer I have heard.

  7. #16
    Member Since
    Jun 2006
    Location
    betwwen lost and nowhere,southcentral ks.
    Posts
    1,258
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    most players back then had 2nd jobs. so the conditioning wasnt anywhere nere as good as today. we`d be wore out by half time.
    i can remember what a chief super bowl team looks like! ......

  8. #17
    Member Since
    Sep 2005
    Location
    SE Kansas
    Posts
    28,127
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 255
    Given: 448

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by wolfpack View Post
    most players back then had 2nd jobs. so the conditioning wasnt anywhere nere as good as today. we`d be wore out by half time.
    Agreed.


  9. #18
    Member Since
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    4,841
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 5
    Given: 0

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Hmmm...I'd love to see that game. If you called it on the rules from '69, (i.e. pass interference rules) I don't see Harrison and Wayne having near the success they do in todays game. Peyton is a tough nut, but I'm not so sure his wideouts are.
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    The 49ers own my heart, but the Chiefs will always hold a better than neutral spot for giving my favorite player a place to leave with grace...

    Resident Comedian/Statistician/Researcher/Diplomat

  10. #19
    Member Since
    Sep 2005
    Location
    SE Kansas
    Posts
    28,127
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 255
    Given: 448

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by rbedgood View Post
    Hmmm...I'd love to see that game. If you called it on the rules from '69, (i.e. pass interference rules) I don't see Harrison and Wayne having near the success they do in todays game. Peyton is a tough nut, but I'm not so sure his wideouts are.

    I've seen a few of your replys but did not see a welcome thread. So, welcome to the Crowd! :)


  11. #20
    Member Since
    May 2006
    Posts
    5,091
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 23
    Given: 0

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by sling58 View Post
    Could the 1969 Chiefs beat the 2007 Colts if they could have ever played each other?
    Isn't that what Madden is for?
    THAT quarterback is NOT a Pro Bowl quarterback. Never was and never will be.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •