Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 29 of 29

Thread: Could the 1969 Chiefs beat?

  1. #1
    Member Since
    Aug 2007
    Location
    OKC, OK
    Posts
    3,715
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Default Could the 1969 Chiefs beat?


    0 Not allowed!
    Could the 1969 Chiefs beat the 2007 Colts if they could have ever played each other?
    <a href=http://img218.imageshack.us/img218/5893/dthomassp2.jpg target=_blank>http://img218.imageshack.us/img218/5893/dthomassp2.jpg</a>

    Official thread killer I have heard.

  2. #21
    Member Since
    Sep 2005
    Location
    SE Kansas
    Posts
    28,076
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 249
    Given: 440

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by Guru View Post
    Isn't that what Madden is for?

    HA! Good point!


  3. #22
    Member Since
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Read the name dumbass!!
    Posts
    13,343
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 24
    Given: 29

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    I ll tell you all what....I just watched the highlight film from the 69 Chiefs and I dont care about the conditioning and blah blah about athletes today. The 69 Chiefs were big and badass and I think they would have half of the Colts starting lineup on the bench injured or scared by halftime. Sure the Colts might be able to run longer, if they dont have a broken leg or cracked ribs. Manning would be cryin after the first hit!! The Chiefs would lay an absolute *** whippin on the Colts no doubt!!
    The only reason a beer sweats around Canada is because he's decided it will be the next beer he drinks.

  4. #23
    Member Since
    Sep 2005
    Location
    SE Kansas
    Posts
    28,076
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 249
    Given: 440

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by Canada's #1 Chiefs Fan View Post
    I ll tell you all what....I just watched the highlight film from the 69 Chiefs and I dont care about the conditioning and blah blah about athletes today. The 69 Chiefs were big and badass and I think they would have half of the Colts starting lineup on the bench injured or scared by halftime. Sure the Colts might be able to run longer, if they dont have a broken leg or cracked ribs. Manning would be cryin after the first hit!! The Chiefs would lay an absolute *** whippin on the Colts no doubt!!
    I understand what you're sayin, but the game has undergone a bit of a evolution since then. Not taking anything at all away from our one and only SB victory, but the comparison really is apples and oranges. JMHO


  5. #24
    Member Since
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Read the name dumbass!!
    Posts
    13,343
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 24
    Given: 29

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by Chiefster View Post
    I understand what you're sayin, but the game has undergone a bit of a evolution since then. Not taking anything at all away from our one and only SB victory, but the comparison really is apples and oranges. JMHO
    You still have to run the ball and pass the ball and hit the guy that has the ball.
    The only reason a beer sweats around Canada is because he's decided it will be the next beer he drinks.

  6. #25
    Member Since
    Sep 2005
    Location
    SE Kansas
    Posts
    28,076
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 249
    Given: 440

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by Canada's #1 Chiefs Fan View Post
    You still have to run the ball and pass the ball and hit the guy that has the ball.

    Agreed bud; and Hank Stram was considered to be decades ahead of his time as far as offensive innovation, but the fact of the matter is that players on the whole today are bigger, stronger, faster and more physical IMO.


  7. #26
    Member Since
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Read the name dumbass!!
    Posts
    13,343
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 24
    Given: 29

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by Chiefster View Post
    Agreed bud; and Hank Stram was considered to be decades ahead of his time as far as offensive innovation, but the fact of the matter is that players on the whole today are bigger, stronger, faster and more physical IMO.
    Not the Colts...faster maybe, but for big strong and tough, i will take the Chiefs
    The only reason a beer sweats around Canada is because he's decided it will be the next beer he drinks.

  8. #27
    Member Since
    Sep 2005
    Location
    SE Kansas
    Posts
    28,076
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 249
    Given: 440

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by Canada's #1 Chiefs Fan View Post
    Not the Colts...faster maybe, but for big strong and tough, i will take the Chiefs

    Yeah, you may have a point there; I was speaking more of the league in general, but I do think that they are more athletic, but I could be wrong and often are. :)


  9. #28
    Member Since
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Read the name dumbass!!
    Posts
    13,343
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 24
    Given: 29

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by Chiefster View Post
    Yeah, you may have a point there; I was speaking more of the league in general, but I do think that they are more athletic, but I could be wrong and often are. :)
    They sure would have scored more than the '07 Chiefs did, that's for sure!!
    The only reason a beer sweats around Canada is because he's decided it will be the next beer he drinks.

  10. #29
    Member Since
    Sep 2005
    Location
    SE Kansas
    Posts
    28,076
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 249
    Given: 440

    Default


    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by Canada's #1 Chiefs Fan View Post
    They sure would have scored more than the '07 Chiefs did, that's for sure!!

    No argument there.


Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •