Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 34

Thread: Should Vick be allowed to play in the NFL again?

  1. #1
    Member Since
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Kansas City Missouri
    Posts
    3,814

    Default Should Vick be allowed to play in the NFL again?

    I think he should be. Stallworth killed a man. Ricky Williams has had multiple bans and is still here. Pacman has had several.

    I think it is only fair that he atleast gets one more chance.


    I also think we should get him as a part of the TG trade. Get us something that could help us now, not in the next few years.
    <a href=http://www.chiefscrowd.com/forums/../../../../image.php?type=sigpic&userid=2553&dateline=1258934108 target=_blank>http://www.chiefscrowd.com/forums/.....ine=1258934108</a>

  2. #2
    Member Since
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Miles City, Montana
    Posts
    2,115

    Default

    He he shows everyone that he has changed and does alot of community and charity work for the NFL then ya....but he still has to show he can play

    ......but PETA would be on the NFL's *** every day of the week if they let him play.

  3. #3
    Member Since
    Sep 2007
    Location
    RIGHT NEXT TO ARROWHEAD!
    Posts
    18,752

    Default

    He'll end up in the U F L most likely this season.

    Then if he doesn't look like total crap he will get to play in the NFL again I'm sure.
    http://arrowheadjunkies.com/pictures/PhotoShop/sig_pics/NFL_Players/kansas_city_chiefs/tyson.jackson/062009/tyson.jackson.500.png

  4. #4
    Member Since
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,915

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by honda522 View Post
    I think he should be. Stallworth killed a man. Ricky Williams has had multiple bans and is still here. Pacman has had several.

    I think it is only fair that he atleast gets one more chance.


    I also think we should get him as a part of the TG trade. Get us something that could help us now, not in the next few years.
    Here's the thing. I just don't care that he was fighting dogs. Bankolling gambling? I care a little bit. But not enough to support a ban.

    I'm not a vegetarian. My shoes are made of leather. I like rodeos and bullfights. I don't see dogs as any different than those animals.

    The Chiefs shouldn't try for Vick. We just spent $60M on a franchise QB. Vick is a distraction and a glory hog. He also stinks on grass and in bad weather. He's also going to take a couple of years to get reconditioned to the NFL. Pass.

  5. #5
    Member Since
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Kansas City Missouri
    Posts
    3,814

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jmlamerson View Post
    Here's the thing. I just don't care that he was fighting dogs. Bankolling gambling? I care a little bit. But not enough to support a ban.

    I'm not a vegetarian. My shoes are made of leather. I like rodeos and bullfights. I don't see dogs as any different than those animals.

    The Chiefs shouldn't try for Vick. We just spent $60M on a franchise QB. Vick is a distraction and a glory hog. He also stinks on grass and in bad weather. He's also going to take a couple of years to get reconditioned to the NFL. Pass.
    I

    I agree.

    And I was joking about Vick here. I just felt like we should of had something THIS YEAR rather than in a few years to use.
    <a href=http://www.chiefscrowd.com/forums/../../../../image.php?type=sigpic&userid=2553&dateline=1258934108 target=_blank>http://www.chiefscrowd.com/forums/.....ine=1258934108</a>

  6. #6
    Member Since
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Gardner
    Posts
    2,834

    Default

    I would never want Vick as a Chief - I could care less what other teams do, and I hope he is sorry for what he did. It is interesting, we just spent the last couple days on a cousins farm and we did eat their own beef - the major difference between those animals and how vick treated the dogs is they are healthy well fed and very well cared for. Dog fighters do not feed the dogs well, they are malnourished, kept in filthy cages and are mistreated to make them fight better. I would never view dogs (mans best friend) as livestock. I train them well and it has nothing to do with the peta idiots out there.

  7. #7
    Member Since
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Kansas City Missouri
    Posts
    3,814

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tammietailgator View Post
    I would never want Vick as a Chief - I could care less what other teams do, and I hope he is sorry for what he did. It is interesting, we just spent the last couple days on a cousins farm and we did eat their own beef - the major difference between those animals and how vick treated the dogs is they are healthy well fed and very well cared for. Dog fighters do not feed the dogs well, they are malnourished, kept in filthy cages and are mistreated to make them fight better. I would never view dogs (mans best friend) as livestock. I train them well and it has nothing to do with the peta idiots out there.
    There is no proof that he did anything to the dogs. The only proof they have is him hosting the pools.
    <a href=http://www.chiefscrowd.com/forums/../../../../image.php?type=sigpic&userid=2553&dateline=1258934108 target=_blank>http://www.chiefscrowd.com/forums/.....ine=1258934108</a>

  8. #8
    Member Since
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Gardner
    Posts
    2,834

    Default

    He was supporting the way they are treated. I am a dog trainer and you cannot tell me that in order to get the results these people want for the sake of wagers, that these dogs live in acceptable conditions.

  9. #9
    Member Since
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Kansas City Missouri
    Posts
    3,814

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tammietailgator View Post
    He was supporting the way they are treated. I am a dog trainer and you cannot tell me that in order to get the results these people want for the sake of wagers, that these dogs live in acceptable conditions.
    Well thats what I was say, he supported it, but there is no proof of his physical involvment. He supported it financially.

    I don't agree with what he did, but I believe he desveres a second chance.
    <a href=http://www.chiefscrowd.com/forums/../../../../image.php?type=sigpic&userid=2553&dateline=1258934108 target=_blank>http://www.chiefscrowd.com/forums/.....ine=1258934108</a>

  10. #10
    Member Since
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Ventura, Ca.
    Posts
    2,607

    Default

    He will play, likely end up with the Raiders, Al Davis likes players like him and we all know that tall lanky dude they have now is going to suck again this year.


    Are you man enough? Eric Berry? Apparently Not!

Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 2570
    Last Post: 01-02-2024, 10:13 PM
  2. Vick will get a job.
    By honda522 in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 04-03-2009, 11:52 AM
  3. Michael Vick
    By texaschief in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 45
    Last Post: 01-26-2009, 08:51 AM
  4. Why not play against the teams we need to play against !!!
    By virag58 in forum KC Chiefs News and Discussion
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 09-14-2008, 10:16 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •