Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 28

Thread: defensive tackle

  1. #1
    Member Since
    May 2006
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    9,123
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 27
    Given: 26

    Default defensive tackle


    0 Not allowed!
    Obviously, we have a bit of a question at defensive tackle. I wanted to share my view on who will be "the man" at the position.

    Junior Siavii! Why? Just because he reminds me alot of one of my all-time favorites at that position... Dan Saleuwhatshisname.

    Sorry, too lazy to look it up right now.

    But what do we say?

  2. #11
    Member Since
    Sep 2005
    Location
    SE Kansas
    Posts
    28,069
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 247
    Given: 436

    Default Re: defensive tackle


    0 Not allowed!
    milkman wrote:
    The only fire I ever see Siavii lighting is the one at the next luau he attends back on the island.

    Your probably right; I did think that he had potential though.


  3. #12
    Member Since
    May 2006
    Posts
    5,091
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 23
    Given: 0

    Default Re: defensive tackle


    0 Not allowed!
    Chiefster wrote:
    milkman wrote:
    The only fire I ever see Siavii lighting is the one at the next luau he attends back on the island.

    Your probably right; I did think that he had potential though.
    Yeah, but you think that about everyone. :-D
    THAT quarterback is NOT a Pro Bowl quarterback. Never was and never will be.

  4. #13
    Member Since
    Sep 2005
    Location
    SE Kansas
    Posts
    28,069
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 247
    Given: 436

    Default Re: defensive tackle


    0 Not allowed!
    Guru wrote:
    Chiefster wrote:
    milkman wrote:
    The only fire I ever see Siavii lighting is the one at the next luau he attends back on the island.

    Your probably right; I did think that he had potential though.
    Yeah, but you think that about everyone. :-D



    Hey; it's a safe statement. Most everyone knows that I'm full of crap.


  5. #14
    Member Since
    May 2006
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    9,123
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 27
    Given: 26

    Default Re: defensive tackle


    0 Not allowed!
    Well, now, the whole Siavii comparison to big Dan was actually intended for amusement. But, Myself, I was impressed with the improvement to the defense last season. I've been reading alot about the problems with the D-line lately. But the run defense was the one area that we actually improved.

    (Giants game aside) I didn't see a whole lot of the interior line being thrown around. And even in the Giants game, tackling was the real problem. Inside, outside, everywhere on the field, poor tackling was the achilles' heel for us that day.

    Basically, I want Siavii to become a stud because he looks (physically) like Dan. I don't think that he is a stud. But, I don't believe that he is a "scrub" either.

  6. #15
    Member Since
    May 2006
    Posts
    5,091
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 23
    Given: 0

    Default Re: defensive tackle


    0 Not allowed!
    chief31 wrote:
    But the run defense was the one area that we actually improved.

    (Giants game aside)


    Glad you pulled that game aside after you praised the defense.

    You are right, the run defense did improve over the previous season.
    THAT quarterback is NOT a Pro Bowl quarterback. Never was and never will be.

  7. #16
    Member Since
    Sep 2005
    Location
    SE Kansas
    Posts
    28,069
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 247
    Given: 436

    Default Re: defensive tackle


    0 Not allowed!
    They were better at stopping the run; overall, however, the defensive front couldn't get to the QB to save their lives.


  8. #17
    Member Since
    May 2006
    Posts
    5,091
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 23
    Given: 0

    Default Re: defensive tackle


    0 Not allowed!
    Chiefster wrote:
    They were better at stopping the run; overall, however, the defensive front couldn't get to the QB to save their lives.
    Actually, they couldn't get to the QB BECAUSE they were saving their own lives.
    THAT quarterback is NOT a Pro Bowl quarterback. Never was and never will be.

  9. #18
    Member Since
    Sep 2005
    Location
    SE Kansas
    Posts
    28,069
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 247
    Given: 436

    Default Re: defensive tackle


    0 Not allowed!
    Guru wrote:
    Chiefster wrote:
    They were better at stopping the run; overall, however, the defensive front couldn't get to the QB to save their lives.
    Actually, they couldn't get to the QB BECAUSE they were saving their own lives.
    Well that does keep a person busy.


  10. #19
    Member Since
    Jun 2006
    Location
    western kentucky
    Posts
    107
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Default Re: defensive tackle


    0 Not allowed!
    I wish junior the best.But I have yet to see any bigtime plays out of him yet. Herm say you have to be avalable to be on the team. That kinda cuts his chances of staying a chief if he keeps staying hurt.

  11. #20
    Member Since
    Sep 2005
    Location
    SE Kansas
    Posts
    28,069
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 247
    Given: 436

    Default Re: defensive tackle


    0 Not allowed!
    KC-Krazo wrote:
    I wish junior the best.But I have yet to see any bigtime plays out of him yet. Herm say you have to be avalable to be on the team. That kinda cuts his chances of staying a chief if he keeps staying hurt.
    He and Sims seem to be accident prone.


Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •