Page 5 of 15 FirstFirst 123456789 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 146

Thread: Brodie"the future" Croyle

  1. #1
    Member Since
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Scottsdale, Arizona
    Posts
    1,852

    Default Brodie"the future" Croyle

    Another two crucial INT's!!!! Man this kid has a future!!

  2. #41
    Member Since
    May 2006
    Posts
    5,092

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DrunkHillbilly View Post
    My point is that both Garrard and Garcia were available to be picked up or traded for in the off season. Once again, we did nothing in free agency. We decided to put our teams hopes on the shoulders Damon Huard?????? Yea, he came in and did well when the starter went down but to count on him as your starter going into a new season? With a rookie as a backup and no 3rd stringer?? Come on! Garrard and Garcia are both taking their respective teams to places not many people expected them to be. I agree he is young but I was not a fan of drafting him when we did and as you can see, I am still not a fan of his now. I hear people talking about his "strong arm", well, I think Favre has shown us that a strong arm doesn't mean accurate passing! I do think it is funny how you just compared Croyle to 3 of the best all time QB's though! My guess is that we will be looking for another QB in a few years.
    Croyle is NOT a rookie this year. How come everybody forgets this? He has carried the clipboard for a year and a half. Any more than that and he is a wasted draft pick.
    THAT quarterback is NOT a Pro Bowl quarterback. Never was and never will be.

  3. #42
    Member Since
    May 2006
    Posts
    5,092

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chiefster View Post
    It earned him the nickname trINT.
    I gave JW the idea for that nickname.. I sent 810, at the time, an email using Tr-INT for his name like 5 times. This was in Trent's first year. I was very unhappy with him. I know better now.

    I will never get credit for it but still.....
    THAT quarterback is NOT a Pro Bowl quarterback. Never was and never will be.

  4. #43
    Member Since
    Sep 2005
    Location
    SE Kansas
    Posts
    31,643

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Guru View Post
    I gave JW the idea for that nickname.. I sent 810, at the time, an email using Tr-INT for his name like 5 times. This was in Trent's first year. I was very unhappy with him. I know better now.

    I will never get credit for it but still.....
    We'll give you credit for it here, FWIW!

  5. #44
    Member Since
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Cedar Park, TX
    Posts
    633

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DrunkHillbilly View Post
    My point is that both Garrard and Garcia were available to be picked up or traded for in the off season. Garrard and Garcia are both taking their respective teams to places not many people expected them to be.
    Jeff Garcia? Seriously? The guy would fit right in with the Chiefs mentality of bringing in QBs in the waning moments of the careers. I can't believe Garcia would even be mentioned. The guy is 37 years old! He also has a decent coach and a line to protect him, and WR's to throw to that can actually hold onto a catch!

    Garrard is doing well, but he has a team of WRs to work with and a line that works for him. He's also going to be 30 in Feb and is another example of why he shouldn't have been brought in. If he stays healthy he'll probably play three more years of good football. So that doesn't really help us long term.

    We need a young QB that we can develop into a franchise player. The days of bringing in old washed up QBs, or any other player for that matter, to play two or three seasons is over. That mentality, thanks in no small part to Carl Peterson, has led us to the horrible situation we're in right now.

    Like it or not, Croyle is our QB for the future. Even the great QB's like Elway, Favre, Marino and Manning all had rough starts in the NFL. Even Vince Young has struggled. It's a tough game and completely different from college and there is a big learning curve that can only be overcome with time.

    This team is not going to see a serious playoff run for several years. So why spend a lot of money to bring in talent for one position? The whole team needs to be re-worked and that is going to take time and some good drafting. A lot of the older players will be jettisoned. I expect Dunn, Wiegman, Law, Surtain, Turley, Bell, Drummond, Carney and even Huard to be gone this off season.

    Jamaal Charles. University of Texas.

  6. #45
    Member Since
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Scottsdale, Arizona
    Posts
    1,852

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by luv View Post
    How many INT's did Trent Green throw in his umpteenth year? Complaining over two? C'mon.
    This is funny!!! Your comparing Croyle to Green??? Showin me a lot now luv!!

  7. #46
    Member Since
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Scottsdale, Arizona
    Posts
    1,852

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Guru View Post
    Carl loves fans like you. Band-aid. Don't build.
    I never said don't fix it. Those band aids you speak of are working fairly well I would say in Tampa and J-Ville don't ya think???

  8. #47
    Member Since
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Scottsdale, Arizona
    Posts
    1,852

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Guru View Post
    Croyle is NOT a rookie this year. How come everybody forgets this? He has carried the clipboard for a year and a half. Any more than that and he is a wasted draft pick.
    We all know this!!!! I am speaking in playing terms.

  9. #48
    Member Since
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Read the name dumbass!!
    Posts
    13,363

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DrunkHillbilly View Post
    I never said don't fix it. Those band aids you speak of are working fairly well I would say in Tampa and J-Ville don't ya think???
    So u assume that they would play well in KC??
    The only reason a beer sweats around Canada is because he's decided it will be the next beer he drinks.

  10. #49
    Member Since
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Scottsdale, Arizona
    Posts
    1,852

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by greg3564 View Post
    Jeff Garcia? Seriously? The guy would fit right in with the Chiefs mentality of bringing in QBs in the waning moments of the careers. I can't believe Garcia would even be mentioned. The guy is 37 years old! He also has a decent coach and a line to protect him, and WR's to throw to that can actually hold onto a catch!

    Garrard is doing well, but he has a team of WRs to work with and a line that works for him. He's also going to be 30 in Feb and is another example of why he shouldn't have been brought in. If he stays healthy he'll probably play three more years of good football. So that doesn't really help us long term.

    We need a young QB that we can develop into a franchise player. The days of bringing in old washed up QBs, or any other player for that matter, to play two or three seasons is over. That mentality, thanks in no small part to Carl Peterson, has led us to the horrible situation we're in right now.

    Like it or not, Croyle is our QB for the future. Even the great QB's like Elway, Favre, Marino and Manning all had rough starts in the NFL. Even Vince Young has struggled. It's a tough game and completely different from college and there is a big learning curve that can only be overcome with time.

    This team is not going to see a serious playoff run for several years. So why spend a lot of money to bring in talent for one position? The whole team needs to be re-worked and that is going to take time and some good drafting. A lot of the older players will be jettisoned. I expect Dunn, Wiegman, Law, Surtain, Turley, Bell, Drummond, Carney and even Huard to be gone this off season.
    You can't be serious with this post!! How did Garcia do with the Eagles??? Tampa??? I don't want him as our franchise but if we are going to have a below avg QB playing, we can atleast give him somebody who knows what the hell is going on right there with him!! As far as Garrard goes, I would have traded for him 2 fricken years ago. This kid is good!!! 2 or 3 INT's on the year!!!! He's mobile and accurate!! C 'mon, he would be a 100% upgrade from Croyle!!

  11. #50
    Member Since
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Read the name dumbass!!
    Posts
    13,363

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DrunkHillbilly View Post
    You can't be serious with this post!! How did Garcia do with the Eagles??? Tampa??? I don't want him as our franchise but if we are going to have a below avg QB playing, we can atleast give him somebody who knows what the hell is going on right there with him!! As far as Garrard goes, I would have traded for him 2 fricken years ago. This kid is good!!! 2 or 3 INT's on the year!!!! He's mobile and accurate!! C 'mon, he would be a 100% upgrade from Croyle!!
    U do realize that they hardly ever throw the ball right?
    The only reason a beer sweats around Canada is because he's decided it will be the next beer he drinks.

Page 5 of 15 FirstFirst 123456789 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •