Originally Posted by
My Man Orton
IF you had read my post above I stated there is certain risk involved in signing peyton manning. BUT THE REWARD FAR OUTWEIGHS THE RISK. Carlson is no manning so dont even try to compare the two. His production did decrease.
in 08 55 rec 621 yards
09 51 rec 574 yards
10 31 rec 318 yards
Do you see? So you want to bring in a guy who is questionable to be healthy and missed the entire 2011 season to add depth to moaeki who also missed all of the 2011 season.
Yes, your logic makes tons of sense
There is no point in continuing this discussion, because he is going to the Vikings, but he has been more productive with each catch every year. He has just been getting thrown to less. But I'm repeating myself. I already made that point and you couldn't grasp it.
Regarding his risk factor:
Originally Posted by
Jrudi
He's a low risk, because if you read my previous post, he will more than likely come at a discounted price because he missed last season.
The idea of a "low risk, high reward" signing is not referring to his injury, it is a business phrase that goes along with the idea that we won't have to pay him a large contract to bring him in (We're not out a lot of money if it doesn't work out) but He has the potential and has shown that he could be a reliable starter in the league (so high reward, meaning he could easily outplay the contract we will give him)
Low risk (not a lot of money)- High Reward (potential to give you more than you paid for him)
Do I need to spell it out any more for ya?
Again, already addressed ... Not sinking in.
***Official Chiefs Crowd Game Thread Starter***
This space is reserved for something that has nothing whatsoever to do with MatthewsChiefs. (Whoever THAT is!)
Bookmarks