Originally Posted by
texaschief
also, i fail to see why trading 3 players who don't really want to be here anyway is such a bad thing.
Larry has NEVER wanted to be here.
Jared doesn't want to be here.
Tony can't afford a rebuild at this point in his career.
For the optomist here, what year will the Chiefs be in the Super Bowl? It OBVIOUSLY won't happen in the next few years since "Herm is such a bad coach," so why wouldn't you trade Tony? This isn't a ZERO SUM game. The Chiefs will still throw on the downs they need to throw. It will just be thrown to a different target. Most of those receptions will just be dispersed amongst the new TE and the WRs. Just be Gonzo would be gone doesn't mean you lose 1000 receptions.
Originally Posted by
texaschief
Really? 100? so you DO believe it's zero sum and that Gonzo's replacement would catch zero passes all season?
You said 1000 receptions, I thought you meant with the new TE and WR's, with T.G. gone we would lose 1000 receptions, which I don't know how that would be possible, so I was just saying if for some record setting reason, our receiver core caught 1000, I said they could lose 100. What team catches 1000 receptions?
"If you need braggin' on, let someone else do it"-my dad
Bookmarks