Originally Posted by
josh1971
While I agree that the secondary is the weak link with our defense, with our scheme and obvious bad play calling, having Pollard get burnt on long pass plays isn't much different from having our current safeties get burnt on long pass plays.
Has it occurred to the disciples of our lord Pollard that he is prospering in Houston because it was a change of scene, and the scheme there (as well as talent surrounding him) fits him better?
Whatever you have to tell yourself to remain convinced that you can't be wrong.
Pollard is playing like a champ. And we are left with a defensive backfield that is just full of failure.
And trying to convince someone that the mighty defense of The Texans is just making a crappy player look like a star is just as fail as our current safeties are.
Here's a notion...
Pollard isn't, and never was, half as bad as you have convinced yourself that he is.
Is it at all possible that a couple of bad plays, by a young, poorly coached player, may have gotten under your skin, and made you a bit overly-judgemental of that players talent?
Seems alot more likely than what you're suggesting.
Mike Brown B. Pollard
8 Games 6 Games
47 Tckl 42 tckl
0 Int 2 Int
0 FF 1 FF
0 P Defl 3 P Defl
1 Sack 0 Sack
Mike Brown came here as a well-known big play Safety. Maybe we should compare career numbers for these two...?
Bookmarks