Bengals Score 8 TD’s?
Home › Forums › Kansas City Chiefs › The Locker Room › Bengals Score 8 TD’s?
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
09/07/2006 at 4:59 pm #729983
Here’s a thread to make predictions for individual performances for this week’s game. Here’s mine:
Carson Palmer: 19-25, 317 yards, 3 TD, 0 INT
Rudi Johnson: 27 carries, 144 yards, 2 TD
Chad Johnson: 7 receptions, 113 yards, 1 TD
TJ Houshmandzadeh: 6 receptions, 97 yards, 1 TD
Chris Henry: 3 receptions, 74 yards, 1 TDCincinnati Defense comes up with 4 sacks, 2 picks, and one fumble recovery.
Larry Johnson: 33 carries, 106 yards, 2 TD
What do you think?
This is hot off the presses at the Bengal Board, Rudi Johnson gets more yard than LJ, in his dreams.
Well that’s their assesments as they boast of their coming victory, personally I don’t see them finding their way out of the Jungle alive. GO CHIEF’S09/07/2006 at 5:03 pm #759442While it may appear to add up to eight touchdowns being scored by the Bengals there, it is actually only five.
Seems to me, that they predict that the Chiefs will only be putting eight men on the field at a time. interesting.
09/07/2006 at 5:03 pm #759443While it may appear to add up to eight touchdowns being scored by the Bengals there, it is actually only five.
Seems to me, that they predict that the Chiefs will only be putting eight men on the field at a time. interesting.
09/07/2006 at 5:14 pm #759444You are correct, they are boasting only five, 4 sacks? I guess the offensive line must not be in the game, I don’t think they had 4 sacks in any game they played last year,
but let’s turn that mean red machine loose on Carson and see if thier offensive line shows up. GO CHIEF’S!😆
09/07/2006 at 5:21 pm #759445Hmmmmm; this looks like fodder for the Smack talk forum.
09/07/2006 at 5:37 pm #759448Two things. First off, The Bengals gave up less sacks (21)than anybody last year except the Colts who had 20. The offensive line is good.
Add the fact that there is extra incentive to keep Carson’s jersey clean, you guys get none Sunday
Second thing-The Bengals offense is already in sync. There is no “getting the timing down” or “flipping the switch on”, it’s already on and the timing is down.
It’s gonna be fun on Sunday. :pint:09/07/2006 at 5:40 pm #759450Quote:drunkenben wrote:
…It’s gonna be fun on Sunday. :pint:Well, on this much you and I do agree. 😡
09/07/2006 at 6:20 pm #759454drunkenben wrote:
Two things. First off, The Bengals gave up less sacks (21)than anybody last year except the Colts who had 20. The offensive line is good.
Add the fact that there is extra incentive to keep Carson’s jersey clean, you guys get none Sunday
Second thing-The Bengals offense is already in sync. There is no “getting the timing down” or “flipping the switch on”, it’s already on and the timing is down.
It’s gonna be fun on Sunday.First it is the Bengals bragging 4 sacks not the Chief’s, and second Carson Palmers football uniform is going to be dirty at the end of the game, I don’t care how good the offensive (smellly) line is.
Secondly Palmer will not be any more in sync than Trent will be, so that’s a wash, as Chiefster put it so well, I will agree it will be fun. GO CHIEF’S!
:hammer: :hammer: :hammer:09/08/2006 at 1:44 am #759464Quote:Seems to me, that they predict that the Chiefs will only be putting eight men on the field at a time. interesting.Actually, they’re playing the cheerleaders the first half. And still, the Bengals can get only 8 tds. Go figure.
09/08/2006 at 4:32 am #759465Quote:prough91 wrote:Quote:Seems to me, that they predict that the Chiefs will only be putting eight men on the field at a time. interesting.Actually, they’re playing the cheerleaders the first half. And still, the Bengals can get only 8 tds. Go figure.
Eh, that’s a liberal estimate.
09/08/2006 at 5:31 am #759469Awwwww Shucks! There you guys go, giving our secret plan away to beat the Bungles er I mean Bengals, they will be SOOooo tired out from chasing the CheerLeaders, that they will have to play the waterboys and trainers plus a coach or two the second half. Now come on quite giving away our strategy to the opposing poster’s.
GO CHIEF’S!!:pint: 😆 :hammer:
09/08/2006 at 5:38 am #759470Quote:kenny1937 wrote:
Here’s a thread to make predictions for individual performances for this week’s game. Here’s mine:Carson Palmer: 19-25, 317 yards, 3 TD, 0 INT
Rudi Johnson: 27 carries, 144 yards, 2 TD
Chad Johnson: 7 receptions, 113 yards, 1 TD
TJ Houshmandzadeh: 6 receptions, 97 yards, 1 TD
Chris Henry: 3 receptions, 74 yards, 1 TDCincinnati Defense comes up with 4 sacks, 2 picks, and one fumble recovery.
Larry Johnson: 33 carries, 106 yards, 2 TD
What do you think?
This is hot off the presses at the Bengal Board, Rudi Johnson gets more yard than LJ, in his dreams.
Well that’s their assesments as they boast of their coming victory, personally I don’t see them finding their way out of the Jungle alive. GO CHIEF’Sthat is actually only 5 TDs.
09/08/2006 at 6:15 am #759475Quote:Guru wrote:Quote:kenny1937 wrote:
Here’s a thread to make predictions for individual performances for this week’s game. Here’s mine:Carson Palmer: 19-25, 317 yards, 3 TD, 0 INT
Rudi Johnson: 27 carries, 144 yards, 2 TD
Chad Johnson: 7 receptions, 113 yards, 1 TD
TJ Houshmandzadeh: 6 receptions, 97 yards, 1 TD
Chris Henry: 3 receptions, 74 yards, 1 TDCincinnati Defense comes up with 4 sacks, 2 picks, and one fumble recovery.
Larry Johnson: 33 carries, 106 yards, 2 TD
What do you think?
This is hot off the presses at the Bengal Board, Rudi Johnson gets more yard than LJ, in his dreams.
Well that’s their assesments as they boast of their coming victory, personally I don’t see them finding their way out of the Jungle alive. GO CHIEF’Sthat is actually only 5 TDs.
Eh, math is not a family strong suite. LOL!
(Just kiddin K-dude; don’t hurt me.) 😆
09/08/2006 at 6:28 am #759477Actually Chief31 caught that error right off the bat, and I had to acknowledge that there was only five, now come on guys I may be off in my enthusiasm and math, but please read the post’s from beginning to end. I wouldn’t hurt one hair on your head Chiefster, you are by far my favorite posters to banter with, as well as Guru and all of you other fine Chief’s fans. Having said all that-GO CHIEF’S!!!
:pint: 😆
09/08/2006 at 6:31 am #759479Quote:kenny1937 wrote:
Actually Chief31 caught that error right off the bat, and I had to acknowledge that there was only five, now come on guys I may be off in my enthusiasm and math, but please read the post’s from beginning to end. I wouldn’t hurt one hair on your head Chiefster, you are by far my favorite posters to banter with, as well as Guru and all of you other fine Chief’s fans. Having said all that-GO CHIEF’S!!!:pint: 😆
So, tell us how you really feel. 😆
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.